ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

典型之债与非典型之债划分刍议

夏梓耀

夏梓耀. 典型之债与非典型之债划分刍议[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(2): 55-59.
引用本文: 夏梓耀. 典型之债与非典型之债划分刍议[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(2): 55-59.
Xia Ziyao. On Classification of Typical Obligation and Un-typical Obligation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(2): 55-59.
Citation: Xia Ziyao. On Classification of Typical Obligation and Un-typical Obligation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(2): 55-59.

典型之债与非典型之债划分刍议

详细信息
    作者简介:

    夏梓耀(1989-),男,湖南安化人,博士研究生,研究方向为环境资源法、民商法.

  • 中图分类号: D923.3

On Classification of Typical Obligation and Un-typical Obligation

  • 摘要: 债是特定当事人之间请求为特定行为的具有相对性和财产性的民事法律关系,"公法之债"不在债的范围内。合同之债、无因管理之债、不当得利之债、侵权行为之债为典型之债,此四种类型以外的其他债为非典型之债。非典型之债在民商法中广泛存在,拾得遗失物中的报酬请求关系即为其中一种。相对于典型之债,非典型之债具有依附性、个别性、分散性的特性。典型之债与非典型之债的划分,为债法总则的设立提供了支持,但本身存在名实不符的弊端。以独立之债与依附之债的划分替代典型之债与非典型之债的划分,较为适宜。
    Abstract: The obligations in public law do not belong to the concept of "obligation" we use in common sense, which means someone under obligation in private law to perform an act. Typical obligations consist of the obligation of contract, obligation of management under no duty, obligation of unjust enrichment and obligation of torts. Other kinds of obligations are un-typical obligations. Untypical obligations exist in the Civil Law widely, one of which is the reward request right of lost property finders. Compared with typical obligation, un-typical obligation is dependent, individual and scattered. Though the classification of typical obligations and un-typical obligations support the existence of General Provisions of the Obligation Law, there are problems in the classification. The classification of independent obligations and dependent obligations is better than the classification of typical obligations and un-typical obligations.
  • [1] 柳经纬.从非典型之债看债法总则的设立 [G]//厦门大学法律评论. 厦门:厦门出版社,2007:48-56.
    [2] 彼得罗·彭梵得.罗马法教科书[M].黄风,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:283.
    [3] 张广兴.债法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,1997.
    [4] 施正文.税收债法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008:6-9.
    [5] 柳经纬.非典型之债初探[J].中国政法大学学报,2008(6).
    [6] 张俊浩. 民法学原理:下册[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:623-624.
    [7] 梁慧星. 中国物权法草案建议稿:条文、说明、理由与参考立法例[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:34.
    [8] 王利明. 中国物权法草案建议稿及说明[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001:23.
    [9] 刘保玉.物权法学[M].北京:法制出版社,2007:3-6.
    [10] 王泽鉴.民法物权:第一册通则·所有权[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:282.
    [11] 龙卫球.民法总论[M]. 2版. 北京:中国法制出版社,2002:114.
    [12] 梁慧星. 民法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:8.
    [13] 郑玉波.民法债编总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:20-21.
    [14] 查士丁尼.法学总论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1989:184-185.
    [15] 渠涛.最新日本民法[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2006:4-6.
    [16] 覃有土,麻仓华.我国民法典中债法总则的存废[J].法学,2003(5):101-104.
    [17] 苗延波.中国民法体系研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2010:187-188.
    [18] 沈幼伦.债法原理[M].上海:格致出版社,2010:62.
  • 期刊类型引用(0)

    其他类型引用(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  961
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  625
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-12-11
  • 发布日期:  2013-03-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回