A Thorough Analysis of Infringement of the Succession
-
摘要: 继承权仅指继承既得权,即继承人依据遗嘱或法律规定而承继遗产的权利,继承期待权只是一种期待而非期待权。侵害继承权是指继承开始后,僭称继承人否认真正继承人的继承权并排斥其占有、支配或处分遗产。侵害继承权区别于侵害遗产,表现在救济方式、适用的时效、前提等方面。侵害继承权可由继承法中特有的继承回复请求权制度予以救济,真正继承人可请求僭称继承人一次性概括地回复其占有遗产标的,无须证明被继承人对该继承财产是否有有本权,而仅须证明继承开始时由被继承人直接或间接占有该遗产之事实即可。Abstract: Succession only refers to the acquired right of succession by which the successor can receive the heritage according to law or the will. Expectant right to succession is only an expectation but not an expectant right. Infringement of the succession is a situation in which the succession of the real inheritance was denied and the successor was deprived of the right to possess, control and dispose, by the person who has acquired something from the inheritance on the basis of a right of succession that he does not really have. Infringement of the succession is different from the infringement of heritage in the ways of remedies, prescriptions and conditions and so on. Infringement of the succession can be relieved by the succession restoration right, a special concept in the law of succession. The real successor can require the person to return the object he has acquired from the inheritance in one time, without the burden of proving that the ancestor has the original right to the property, but only under the burden of proving the fact that the ancestor was occupying the property directly or indirectly when the succession started.
-
-
[1] 陈苇. 外国继承法比较与中国民法典继承编制定研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2011. [2] 张玉敏. 继承法律制度研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,1999. [3] 郭明瑞,房绍坤,关涛. 继承法研究[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003. [4] 申卫星. 期待权基本理论研究[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006. [5] 杨与龄. 民法概要[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:369. [6] 史尚宽. 继承法论[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000. [7] 王泽鉴. 侵权行为法[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2009. [8] 王利明. 侵权责任法研究:上[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:85. [9] 史尚宽. 债法总论[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:159. [10] 陈秋君.论侵害身份法益之民事责任[D]. 台北:台湾大学法律学院法律学研究所,2008. [11] 马俊驹,余延满.民法原论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,1998:990. [12] 张康林. 继承回复请求权研究[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:72-73. [13] 刘春茂. 中国民法学·财产继承[M]. 北京:人民法院出版社,2008:149. [14] 张平华,刘耀东. 继承法原理[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2009. [15] 戴炎辉,戴东雄. 继承法[M]. 台北:三民书局,2003. [16] 林秀雄.继承回复请求权相关实务见解之研究[J]. 辅仁法学,2002(23). [17] 林秀雄. 继承权被侵害之意义及时点[J].月旦法学杂志, 1999(47):9. [18] 黄茂荣. 侵害继承权或侵害继承之财产[J].植根杂志,2002(11). [19] 朱代恒,陈天元. 继承之争——继承纠纷典型案例评析[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2006:166. [20] 林秀雄.论继承回复请求权之性质[J]. 政大法学评论, 1993(49). [21] 林秀雄. 继承回复请求权与物上返还请求权之关系[J].月旦法学杂志, 1995(4). [22] 刘召成.德国法上的请求权体系[J]. 河南政法干部管理学院学报,2010(6):183. [23] 黄宗乐.论继承回复请求权[J]. 辅仁法学,1999(18). [24] 朱柏松. 论继承回复请求权与物上请求权之关系——最高法院民国九十年度台上字第四六四号判决评释[J].台湾本土法学,2003(1). [25] 刘德宽. 继承回复请求权之基本问题[J]. 军法专刊, 1980(7):12. [26] 迪特尔·梅迪库斯.德国债法分论[M]. 杜景林,卢谌,译. 北京:法律出版社,2007:641-642.
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量:
下载:
