何来刻薄与寡恩?——商鞅重刑思想简析

详细信息

Why there Was a Ruthlessness: an Analysis on Shang Yang’s Legal Philosophy

Law Shool,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要: 商鞅因其严刑峻法而被后世儒家士子贬抑排斥.纵观商鞅变法改制时期的客观情况,发现变法已经成为改变弱秦命运的必然,其手段只能是尊君任法.商鞅的苛刑重法在贯彻其"农战"思想的庇荫下具有正当和必要的存在意义,所谓的"苛"、"重"更多的是因为与占据正宗地位的儒家思想相左而被如此定位.这也意味着其赢得"刻薄寡恩",实也无可厚非.
- 商鞅变法 /
- 农战 /
- 礼教
Abstract: Shang Yang was derogated by later generations of Confucian intellectuals because of harsh punishment. However, when we restore the objective conditions of Shang Yang reform period, we found that political reform had become inevitable to change the fate of the weak Qin State and the means of reform was to Strengthen the sovereign authority and run all kinds of national affairs by law. It was justified and necessary significance that Shang Yang formulated harsh punishment in implementing Agricultural War. Because of opposition to the orthodox position of Confucianism, the reforms of Shang Yang was affirmed harshly and ungenerously.
- Shang Yang’s Reform /
- Agriculture and War /
- feudal ethics and rites

[1]	瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会[M].北京:中华书局,2003.
[2]	高亨.商君书注译[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[3]	赵明.先秦儒家政治哲学引论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004:4.
[4]	萧公权.中国政治思想史[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998:242.
[5]	欧阳凤莲.《商君书》思想研究 .长春:东北师范大学,2009.
[6]	张祥林.《商君书》成书与思想研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:196—197.
[7]	陆建华.商鞅礼学思想研究[J].孔子研究,2004(4):64—71.
[8]	杨鹤皋.商鞅的法律思想[M].北京:群众出版社,1987:42—43.
[9]	罗世烈.先秦诸子的义利观[J].四川大学学报,1988(1):91—105.
[10]	桑本谦.私人的监控与惩罚——一个经济学的进路[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2005:5.
[11]	睡虎地秦墓竹简整理小组.睡虎地秦简·法律问答[M].北京:文物出版社,1978.
[12]	明辉.西汉中期儒法之辩——从"盐铁会议"出发 .法意:第三辑.北京:商务印书馆,2009:169—197.
[13]	栗劲.秦律通论[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1985:207.
[14]	桑本谦.公共惩罚与私人惩罚的互动——一个解读法律制度的新视角[J].法制与社会发展,2005(5):104—114.
[15]	本杰明·史华兹.古代中国的思想世界[M]. 程钢,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2004:344.