论史蒂夫·富勒的科学治理思想

详细信息

On Steve Fuller’s Thought about the Governance of Science

School of Public Administration, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要: 史蒂夫·富勒的科学治理思想包括科学治理的思想逻辑、现实指向及实现路径三个层面。其思想逻辑层面呈现从开放社会的犯错权到共和主义理想的链条,现实指向层面主要针对大科学与精英主义的改进,实现路径层面指向科学的世俗化与民主化。富勒的科学治理思想重塑了科学发现与社会参与的互动关系,对大学建设具有重要的启示意义,但其科学共和主义思想过于理想化。
- 史蒂夫·富勒 /
- 科学治理 /
- 共和主义
Abstract: Steve Fuller's ideas of the governance of science include three aspects: the thought line, the reality aim,and reaching way about the governance of science. The first aspect takes on a logical link from the right to be wrong in open society to the republicanism ideals. The second aspect focuses on the improvement of big science and its elitism. The third aspect directs to secularization and democratization of science. Steve Fuller's ideas of the governance of science remodel the interaction between scientific discovery and mass participation, and that make a major enlightenment to the development of the university. Meanwhile, Fuller's Republicanism ideas are too idealized in the real world.
- Steve Fuller /
- the governance of science /
- republicanism

[1]	樊春良.科学与治理的兴起及其意义[J].科学学研究,2005(1):7—13.
[2]	丁五启.科学与技术研究和修辞学——史蒂夫·富勒思想探究[J]. 兰州学刊,2006(1):24—26.
[3]	Steve Fuller. New frontiers in science and technology study[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
[4]	史蒂夫·富勒.科学的统治: 开放社会的意识形态与未来[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2006.
[5]	许为民,楼巍,吴依云.技性科学观: 科学技术政策分析的新视角[J].自然辩证法通讯,2009(3):95—98.
[6]	Steve Fuller. The arguments of the governance of science[J]. Futures, 2002(2):174.
[7]	于尔根·哈贝马斯. 世俗化的辩证法[M]//俞吾金.当代国外马克思主义评论.北京:人民出版社,2009:10—11.
[8]	Steve Fuller. The secularization of science and a new deal for science policy[J].Futures,1997(6):499.
[9]	Jerome R Ravetz. Science as superstition[J]. Futures,1997(6):579.
[10]	默顿. 科学社会学——理论与经验研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:365—375.
[11]	丹尼尔·李·克莱曼. 科学技术在社会中: 从生物技术到互联网[M].北京:商务印书馆,2009:207—209.
[12]	刘啸霆.科学、技术与社会概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:10.
[13]	Steve Fuller. Governing science: a reply to critics[J]. Futures,2002(5):457.