A Research of the Major Administrative Decision-making Group Discussion and Decision System
-
摘要: 重大行政决策集体讨论决定制度是指对于重大行政问题，必须充分讨论，集体决定，坚决反对个人说了算或少数人专断。重大行政决策是否科学化、民主化，直接影响到政府行政管理活动的效能。重大行政决策集体讨论决定是民主集中制的直接体现，能够避免在重大行政问题决策上的失误。通过分析和研究重大行政决策集体讨论决定制度的发展现状及其运行的规则和程序，发现中国重大行政决策缺乏统一的集体讨论决定程序，行政机关缺乏民主决策意识，社会公众缺乏民主参政意识及行政决策监督滞后等一系列局限性，指出惟有建立统一高效的重大行政决策集体讨论决定程序、提高行政机关的民主决策意识、提高社会公众的民主参政意识和加强对行政决策的监督才能更好的完善中国重大行政决策的集体讨论决定制度。Abstract: The major administrative decision-making group discussion and decision system means that major administrative problems must be conducted through full discussion and collective decision. Meanwhile, individual or a minority of people's arbitrariness must be firmly opposed. Whether the major administrative decision-making is scientific and democratic, directly affects the effectiveness of government administrative management activities. Because the major administrative decision-making group discussion directly embodies the democratic centralism, major administrative decision-making errors can be avoided. In this paper, we study and analyze the development of the system of the status major administrative decision-making group discussion and decision system operation rules, procedures and lack of the unified collective discussion and decision procedure, administrative departments lack of democratic consciousness, the social public lack of democratic politics consciousness, administrative decision-making supervision lagging behind and a series of limitations, pointing out that only by establishing a unified, efficient collective discussion and decision procedure, improving the administrative departments of the democratic consciousness and the social public awareness of democratic participation as well as strengthening the supervision of administrative decision can we better our major administrative decision-making system of collective discussion and decision of our country.
-
-
[1] Black Duncan. On the rationale of group decision making[J]. Jounral of Political Economy, 1948, 56: 23—24. [2] Black Duncan. The theory of committees and elections[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958: 55—84. [3] 詹姆斯·M·布坎南, 戈登·塔洛克.同意的计算——立宪民 主的逻辑基础[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2000:90—103. [4] 胡象明.党政分开与国家战略决策的民主化[J].湖北社会科学, 1988(3):26—28. [5] 裴泽庆.多维视角下的多数决规则与党内民主决策[J].湖北社会科学, 2006(1):13—17. [6] 郑卫国.影响行政集体决策的心理因素及应对之策[J].成都行政学院学报, 2006(1):20—22. [7] 叶战备, 汪平玲.建立完善集体决策环节的党内问责制[J].求实, 2010(17):11—13. [8] 翟 军亮, 吴春梅.论社会学习框架下公共服务集体决策的优化[J]. 理论与改革, 2012(2):88—91. [9] 杨 继君, 陈林杰.领导集体决策博弈模型及其决策失误分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2011(23): 41—44. [10] Buchanan James M.Liberty, market and state[M]. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1986: 244. [11] Samuelson, Paul A, Nordhaus William D. Economics[M]. 12th Edition. New York:Mcgraw-hill Book Company, 1985:709. [12] 张群梅.公共选择理论的集体决策观分析[J]. 湖南经济管理干部学院学报, 2006(11): 129—130. [13] 杨叶红, 刘峰. 重大行政决策中协商民主的困境与突围——以《湖南省行政程序规定》的实施为例[J]. 中国井冈山干部学院学报, 2010(1): 97—98. [14] 王建军, 唐娟. 论公共政策制定中的公民参与[J]. 四川大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2006(5):57—61. [15] 胡象明.完善政府重大经济社会问题决策的基本程序[J]. 政策, 2004(4): 44—45. [16] 胡象明. 论一体化民主决策模式[J]. 武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 1995(3): 79—83.
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量:
下载:
