ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

当代风险感知理论研究:流派、趋势与论争

王锋

王锋. 当代风险感知理论研究:流派、趋势与论争[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(3): 18-24.
引用本文: 王锋. 当代风险感知理论研究:流派、趋势与论争[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(3): 18-24.
Wang Feng. Contemporary Theory of Risk Perception Research:Schools, Trends and Controversies[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(3): 18-24.
Citation: Wang Feng. Contemporary Theory of Risk Perception Research:Schools, Trends and Controversies[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(3): 18-24.

当代风险感知理论研究:流派、趋势与论争

基金项目: 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(11&ZD173);国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(11AGL009)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王锋(1977- ),男,江西玉山人,讲师,博士研究生,研究方向为应急管理、公共政策.

  • 中图分类号: C912;D63

Contemporary Theory of Risk Perception Research:Schools, Trends and Controversies

  • 摘要: 风险感知是风险评估和风险管理过程的重要组成部分,梳理并借鉴当代风险感知的理论和方法,有助于中国风险评估和风险管理理论及实务水平的进一步提升。心理测量流派强调运用心理学方法对风险根源的主观特征和主观感受进行测量,而文化理论流派则强调从认知主体自身生活方式的视角理解风险感知及与风险有关的行为。两个流派间的学科融合研究趋势以及风险研究的后现代趋势越来越明显。尽管学界围绕公众风险感知研究效用的正反两面的论争不断并仍将继续下去,但风险感知研究应当成为风险管理政策制定的前提和基础。
    Abstract: Risk perception is an important part of risk assessment and risk management. Carding and drawing on contemporary risk perception theories and methods will help further enhance our risk assessment and risk management theory and practical level. Psychometric paradigm emphasizes that subjective characteristics and subjective feeling of risk source is measured by utilizing the method of psychology, while cultural theory paradigm emphasizing cognitive subject can understand risk perception and risk related behavior from the perspective of their way of life. Subject fusion between two schools of study trend and risk of postmodern trend is more and more obvious. Although the debate of both sides on public risk perception research utility will continue in the academic circles, the risk perception research should become the premise and foundation of risk management policy.
  • [1] 保罗·斯洛维奇. 风险感知:对心理测量范式的思考[G]//谢尔顿·克里斯基,多米尼克·戈尔丁.风险的社会理论学说. 北京:北京出版社, 2005.
    [2] Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks[J]. Environment,1979, 21(3):14-20.
    [3] 珍妮·卡斯帕森,罗杰·卡斯帕森,尼克·皮金,等. 风险的社会放大:15年研究与理论评估[G]//尼克·皮金,罗杰·卡斯帕森,保罗·斯洛维奇. 风险的社会放大.北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2010: 6.
    [4] 史蒂夫·雷纳. 文化理论与风险分析[G]//谢尔顿·克里斯基,多米尼克·戈尔丁.风险的社会理论学说.北京:北京出版社,2005.
    [5] 玛丽·道格拉斯. 纯净与危险[M].北京:民族出版社,2008:序12.
    [6] Douglas M. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation,1985:68.
    [7] Ian H Langford,Stavros Georgiou,Ian J Bateman. Public perceptions of health risks from polluted coastal bathing waters: a mixed methodological analysis using cultural theory[J]. Risk Analysis,2000,20(5).
    [8] Thompson M,Ellis R,Wildavsky A. Cultural theory[M]. Boulder,Colorado: Westview Press,1990:5.
    [9] Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures[M]. New York: Basic Books,1973:37.
    [10] 汤姆·霍利克·琼斯,乔纳森·塞姆,尼克·皮金. 环境风险认知的社会动力学:对风险传播研究与实践的意义[G]//尼克·皮金,罗杰·卡斯帕森,保罗·斯洛维奇. 风险的社会放大.北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2010.
    [11] Krimsy S,Plough A. Environmental hazards: communicating risk as a social process[M]. Dover, Mass: Auburn House,1988:58.
    [12] Peter Taylor Gooby,Jens O Zinn. Current directions in risk research: new developments in psychology and sociology[J]. Risk Analysis,2006,26(2):397-411.
    [13] Nick Pidgen. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1998,59(1).
    [14] Rimmington J. Risks and the regulator: puzzles and predicaments[J]. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1995, 73(B):173-181.
    [15] Nick Pidgen,Hood C,Jones D,et al. Risk perception[M]//The Royal Society. Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. London: The Royal Society,1992: 89-134.
    [16] Nick Pidgen. Technocracy, democracy, secrecy and error[M]//Hood C, Jones D K C. Accident and Design. London: University College London Press,1996:161-171.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1355
  • HTML全文浏览量:  31
  • PDF下载量:  1218
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-02-06
  • 发布日期:  2013-05-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回