ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
黄峥. 协商质量的指标化——商谈测量工具综述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(2): 15-21. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0316
引用本文: 黄峥. 协商质量的指标化——商谈测量工具综述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(2): 15-21. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0316
Huang Zheng. Indexing the Deliberative Quality:Review on the Methods for Discourse Measurement[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(2): 15-21. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0316
Citation: Huang Zheng. Indexing the Deliberative Quality:Review on the Methods for Discourse Measurement[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(2): 15-21. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0316

协商质量的指标化——商谈测量工具综述

Indexing the Deliberative Quality:Review on the Methods for Discourse Measurement

  • 摘要: 协商质量的指标化是协商质量的测量工具。斯蒂伯格基于哈贝马斯的商谈伦理设计了第一代商谈质量指标,该指标在“具体指标”“测量要素充分性”“适用性”以及“可靠性”等方面引起了各方的讨论,在此基础上,研究者又相继发展出了编码方案、主体间理性指标和第二代商谈质量指标。

     

    Abstract: Indexization of deliberative quality is a method for deliberation measuring. Marco R Steenbergen and his fellows designed the Discourse Quality Index 1.0 based on Habermas-s discourse ethics, which aroused a lot of debates around the DQI1.0, including the doubt about the credibility of detail indexes, sufficiency, applicability and reliability of DQI1.0 in whole. As a result, researchers developed coding scheme for measuring deliberation-s content, intersubjective rationality index and DQI2.0 as a supplement for DQI1.0.

     

/

返回文章
返回