ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
宋涛. 问责显现的行政执行“中梗阻”现象成因分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2017, 30(6): 114-120. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0408
引用本文: 宋涛. 问责显现的行政执行“中梗阻”现象成因分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2017, 30(6): 114-120. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0408
SONG Tao. Cause Analysis of "Middle Level Obstruction" Phenomenon in Administrative Execution of Accountability Cases[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 30(6): 114-120. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0408
Citation: SONG Tao. Cause Analysis of "Middle Level Obstruction" Phenomenon in Administrative Execution of Accountability Cases[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 30(6): 114-120. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0408

问责显现的行政执行“中梗阻”现象成因分析

Cause Analysis of "Middle Level Obstruction" Phenomenon in Administrative Execution of Accountability Cases

  • 摘要: 现有对"中梗阻"成因的分析主要关注于对公共政策存在的认知差异导致行为差异的现象,而涉及"行政执行原因"被问责的行政问责事件在逻辑上呈现了另一种现象,即在决策相对"合理"的认知一致前提下,仍然会在行政执行中存在"中梗阻"。多案例内容分析结果显示,这种"中梗阻"现象成因一般显现为执行者个体素质构成及行为选择存在的缺失,包括责任缺失,管理失职,对于待解决的公共问题的紧迫程度认识偏差,决策者与执行者之间角色转换认识偏差,地区、部门或自身利益驱使等方面。更进一步的分析显示,管理要素、认知要素与利益要素的深层次影响,构成了"中梗阻"问题的复杂性与解决的难度。

     

    Abstract: The current cause analysis of "middle level obstruction" is mainly concerned with the cognitive differences in understanding public policies. The accountability casesinvolving "administrative executionreasons" logically present a different phenomenon; that is, under the premise of the consistency in regarding the policy-making asrelatively "reasonable" the "middle level obstruction" still exists.In this paper, the results of themulti-case content analysis show that under the premise of keeping the rationality of administrative decision-making, the phenomenon of "middle level obstruction" caused by domestic administrative execution is obviously affected by lack of individual quality constitution and behavior selection, including irresponsibility, maladministration, deviated understanding of the urgency of public issues, deviated understanding of the official role conversion, and region, division or personal interests orientations. Further analysis shows that the administration elements, cognition factors and benefit factorsall contribute heavily tothe complexity and difficulty in solving the problem.

     

/

返回文章
返回