ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
石现升, 李美燕. 互联网电子证据运用与司法实践[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2016, 29(2): 49-54. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0539
引用本文: 石现升, 李美燕. 互联网电子证据运用与司法实践[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2016, 29(2): 49-54. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0539
SHI Xiansheng, LI Meiyan. On Application of Internet E-evidence and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 29(2): 49-54. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0539
Citation: SHI Xiansheng, LI Meiyan. On Application of Internet E-evidence and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 29(2): 49-54. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0539

互联网电子证据运用与司法实践

On Application of Internet E-evidence and Judicial Practice

  • 摘要: 随着云计算、大数据、移动互联网、物联网等新兴信息通信技术的快速发展,传统的网络拓扑结构和资源使用方式发生深远变化,记录虚拟世界各种活动的电子数据以指数形式高速增长。在司法领域,电子数据日益成为认定案件事实的重要证据类型,其作用和重要性日益明显。相对传统证据而言,电子证据取证程序与证据规则有较大的差异。为此,应以互联网电子证据运用与司法实践为着眼点,以全面贯彻证据裁判规则的要求为出发点,探究电子证据真实性认定的新方法。

     

    Abstract: With the rapid development of emerging information network technology, such as cloud computing, big data, mobile Internet, Internet of things, conventional network topology structure and the way to use resources come up with far-reaching transformation. Data information shoot up in the form of index, intelligent terminal evolve from individuality experience to interconnected-scene, driving real-time connectivity between people, people and things, objects and things. In the Internet era, as a type of evidence, electronic data are endowed with new connotation, its role and importance has become increasingly apparent. Compared with traditional evidence, forensics procedure and evidence rules of E-evidence have major difference. Take the application and judicial practice of E-evidence as a point of view, the article will fully implement the requirements for rules of evidentiary adjudication and explore new method for the authenticity of E-evidence.

     

/

返回文章
返回