The relevant provisions of the current aircraft ownership are not perfect, so it is necessary to draw on relevant provisions of the Property Law for refinement and supplement. The article clarifies the nature of the aircraft ownership under construction which is generally movable property. The articles holds the view that delivery and registration can only produce opposing effect. The article suggests the range of the third person be limited and innocent acquisition system be applied. Other related issues include changing the form of aircraft ownership and expanding the acceptance scope of property rights registration of Chinese civil aircraft. The aim of the article is to clarify the relationship between the Property Law and aircraft ownership, and compare the similarities and differences to find out drawback of the aircraft ownership, thus making laws on aircraft ownership more perfect. In order to promote the development of China's aviation industry and the legal system, this article makes suggestions on aircraft ownership in law.