ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
何海波. 行政诉讼法研究3.0[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242
引用本文: 何海波. 行政诉讼法研究3.0[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242
HE Haibo. Administrative Litigation Law Research 3.0 in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242
Citation: HE Haibo. Administrative Litigation Law Research 3.0 in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242

行政诉讼法研究3.0

Administrative Litigation Law Research 3.0 in China

  • 摘要: 随着《行政诉讼法》的修改,行政诉讼法研究进入了它的3.0时代。行政诉讼法研究面对不同层次的课题:来自行政诉讼实践的众多法律适用问题亟需解释和澄清,一些基本制度有待长期、深入的理论研究进一步完善,行政诉讼的实践图景有待实证研究予以揭示。行政诉讼法研究也应更加注重方法:案例研究、原理阐释和比较法研究应当更加专业,综合的、跨学科的理论研究大有可为,实证研究中的定量研究将成趋势。行政诉讼研究多元化的同时,也呼唤研究的规范化。

     

    Abstract: With the amendment of the Administrative Litigation Law (ALL) in 2014, research on the ALL has entered its 3.0 era. Scholars are facing subjects of different levels:Many issues arising from the amended law need to be interpreted and clarified; some fundamental institutions to be improved through long-term in-depth study; the dynamic pictures of legal practice to be described through empirical research. Scholars need more awareness on the research methodologies:Case study, principle elaborations and comparative law study, which are familiar to most legal scholars, should be more professional; comprehensive, cross-disciplinary study will be on rise; empirical study (especially quantative analysis based on the publicized judicial data) will be widely used.

     

/

返回文章
返回