ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
张卫彬, 江昊. 空域的概念刍议[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2021, 34(3): 127-133. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0324
引用本文: 张卫彬, 江昊. 空域的概念刍议[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2021, 34(3): 127-133. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0324
ZHANG Weibin, JIANG Hao. Discussion on the Concept of Airspace[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 34(3): 127-133. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0324
Citation: ZHANG Weibin, JIANG Hao. Discussion on the Concept of Airspace[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 34(3): 127-133. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0324

空域的概念刍议

Discussion on the Concept of Airspace

  • 摘要: 低空无人机公共航路构建及外层空间航天活动的发展,对当前航空航天法的建设提出了诸多挑战。但现行法律未能明确空域概念的具体内涵,并且当前学界研究中存在混淆空域、领空及空气空间等概念的现象,这些因素在客观上迟滞了航空航天法学的发展。因此,首先,应由空域权利的相关主体出发,以空域权利主体的利益诉求为界定视角;其次,应分别辨析空气空间说缺陷、空域与领空的关系等学界研究中存在的概念混淆问题,进而对空域概念的具体内涵加以明确。

     

    Abstract: The application of near ground UAV and the development of outer space activities pose many challenges to the construction of aerospace law. However, the current law does not clearly define the specific connotation of the concept of airspace, and the current academic research also confuses the concept of airspace, territorial airspace and air space, which objectively delays the development of aerospace law. Therefore, first of all, we should start from the perspective of the subject of airspace rights by taking the interest demands of the subject of airspace rights as the definition perspective; secondly, we should distinguish the defects of air space theory, the relationship between airspace and territorial airspace, and then clarify the specific connotation of airspace concept.

     

/

返回文章
返回