ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
樊凡. 概念跨学科、跨领域使用与解释范围的再澄清以“差序格局”为例的探讨[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(4): 90-96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0590
引用本文: 樊凡. 概念跨学科、跨领域使用与解释范围的再澄清以“差序格局”为例的探讨[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(4): 90-96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0590
FAN Fan. Interdisciplinary and Cross-disciplinary Use of Concepts and Re-clarification of the Scope of the Interpretation of Concepts: Taking the Concept of “Differential Mode of Association” as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(4): 90-96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0590
Citation: FAN Fan. Interdisciplinary and Cross-disciplinary Use of Concepts and Re-clarification of the Scope of the Interpretation of Concepts: Taking the Concept of “Differential Mode of Association” as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(4): 90-96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0590

概念跨学科、跨领域使用与解释范围的再澄清以“差序格局”为例的探讨

Interdisciplinary and Cross-disciplinary Use of Concepts and Re-clarification of the Scope of the Interpretation of Concepts: Taking the Concept of “Differential Mode of Association” as an Example

  • 摘要: 对哲学社会科学研究来说,概念与实际不能各行其是,概念与实际的结合程度,理应是概念使用和概念再澄清中不容回避的核心议题。然而,在当前多以问题为中心、以跨学科研究为尚的学术趋势下,相关研究者对概念的跨学科、跨领域使用以及解释范围的再澄清,因普遍轻视了概念与实际关系问题的重要性,常常在具体的研究中造成概念与实际的割裂。具体体现在,对概念跨学科、跨领域的使用,很多时候只是对概念的不当使用, 常常侵蚀了相关研究的科学性和有效性;而那些试图通过明晰、划定解释领域的方式来挽救某个概念的学术努力,大多只是以概念为中心,常常是为了概念而概念。若要更好地对概念进行跨学科、跨领域使用和解释范围的再澄清,就要努力避免为使用而使用、为概念而概念的研究取向,并采用从实践中来,再回到实践中去检验的方式来不断提升概念与实际的结合程度。这既是反思概念自身的理论前提,也是提升概念使用科学性和有效性的必要途径。

     

    Abstract: Concept and practice are inseparable from each other in the research of philosophy and social science, and the integration of concept and practice should be the core issue that can not be neglected in the use and re-clarification of concepts. However, in the current academic situation in which all problem-oriented research and interdisciplinary research are put at the top priority, relevant researchers have often ignored the importance of the relationship between concepts and practice in terms of the interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary use of concepts and the re-clarification of the scope of the interpretation of concepts, which often leads to the separation between concept and practice in the research. This is reflected in the fact that the interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary use of concepts is mostly improper, which often invalidates the scientificity and effectiveness of related research. Many of the academic efforts to save a certain concept by clarifying or delimiting the field of interpretation, are often concept-centered and just made for the sake of the concept. Therefore, a wise way to better use concepts across disciplines and fields and clarify the scope of the interpretation of concepts is to avoid the rigid research orientation of using concepts for the sake of using, and defining concepts for the sake of concepts, and adopt the approach of coming from practice, and then serving practice correspondingly to improve the integration of concepts and practice. This is the theoretical prerequisite for rethinking the concept itself, and also an essential way to enhance the scientific and effective use of the concept.

     

/

返回文章
返回