ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
陈禹衡. 双层社会下短信嗅探犯罪刑法规制研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(3): 180-189. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0640
引用本文: 陈禹衡. 双层社会下短信嗅探犯罪刑法规制研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(3): 180-189. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0640
CHEN Yuheng. Criminal Regulation of SMS Sniffing Crime in the Two-tiered Society[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(3): 180-189. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0640
Citation: CHEN Yuheng. Criminal Regulation of SMS Sniffing Crime in the Two-tiered Society[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(3): 180-189. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0640

双层社会下短信嗅探犯罪刑法规制研究

Criminal Regulation of SMS Sniffing Crime in the Two-tiered Society

  • 摘要: 在双层社会背景下,针对短信嗅探犯罪的刑法规制陷入困局,由于保护法益范畴不明,导致无法对技术作出合理的刑法解释,并且适用的罪名存在竞合。短信嗅探犯罪的保护法益包括财产法益和公民个人信息法益,所以应该适用双重法益说。由于受双层社会场域特征的影响,短信嗅探犯罪实行行为的认定标准和刑法解释发生异化,应该基于保护公民个人信息法益来解释实行行为。在具体规制路径的选择上,应该适用盗窃罪来保护财产法益,与侵犯公民个人信息罪数罪并罚,并在量刑标准上“升维”,保持刑法谦抑性。

     

    Abstract: Under the background of two-tier society, the criminal regulation of SMS sniffing crime is in a dilemma, including the unclear scope of the protection of legal interests, the inability to make a reasonable interpretation of technology in criminal law, and the concurrence of applicable charges. The legal interests of SMS sniffing crime includes the legal interests of property and the citizens’ personal information, so the dual legal interest theory should be applied. The criterion for determining the perpetrating act of SMS sniffing crime and the criminal law interpretation are dissimilated due to the field characteristics of the two-tier society, and the criminal act should be interpreted based on protecting the legal interests of citizens’ personal information. In terms of specific regulatory path, the crime of theft should be applied to protect legal interests of property, and should be punished together with the crime of infringing upon the citizens’ personal information, but the sentencing standards should be “upgraded” to maintain the modesty of criminal law.

     

/

返回文章
返回