ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
于丹. 论民用航空产品责任中“缺陷”的认定标准[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2022, 35(3): 151-157. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1032
引用本文: 于丹. 论民用航空产品责任中“缺陷”的认定标准[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2022, 35(3): 151-157. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1032
YU Dan. Criteria for Identification of "Defects" in Civil Aviation Product Liability[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(3): 151-157. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1032
Citation: YU Dan. Criteria for Identification of "Defects" in Civil Aviation Product Liability[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(3): 151-157. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1032

论民用航空产品责任中“缺陷”的认定标准

Criteria for Identification of "Defects" in Civil Aviation Product Liability

  • 摘要: 民用航空器及其构成部件的适航标准属于《中华人民共和国产品质量法》第46条中的“国家标准”。适航标准服务于国家对民用航空进行安全监管的目的,不宜直接引入产品责任诉讼中作为认定缺陷的依据。从比较法和法律功能论的视角来看,将适航标准定位为航空产品缺陷认定的底线性要求,有助于维护安全监管和私法救济两项活动之间的良性互动。为此,应加强产品缺陷认定的方法论研究,避免司法活动对行政管理规范的不当依赖。

     

    Abstract: The standards of airworthiness are commonly regarded as the "national standards" which is mentioned in Article 46 of the Product Quality Law of the People's Republic of China. However, since the airworthiness standards are formulated in light of the air safety regulation, it is inappropriate to introduce them as the basis for the evaluation of the defects in civil litigations. From the perspectives of comparative law and legal functionalism, it is imperative to place the airworthiness standards as the minimal standards of the identification of defects. Therefore, more researches shall be done on the methods for the identification of defects to avoid current onerous dependence of judicial activities on the administrative regulatory standards.

     

/

返回文章
返回