ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
姜跃, 韩水华, 陈哲. 基于零售商公平偏好的供应链减排与定价决策[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 37(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0035
引用本文: 姜跃, 韩水华, 陈哲. 基于零售商公平偏好的供应链减排与定价决策[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 37(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0035
JIANG Yue, HAN Shuihua, CHEN Zhe. Supply Chain Emission Reduction and Pricing Decision Based on the Retailers’ Fairness Preferences[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0035
Citation: JIANG Yue, HAN Shuihua, CHEN Zhe. Supply Chain Emission Reduction and Pricing Decision Based on the Retailers’ Fairness Preferences[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0035

基于零售商公平偏好的供应链减排与定价决策

Supply Chain Emission Reduction and Pricing Decision Based on the Retailers’ Fairness Preferences

  • 摘要: 将零售商公平偏好引入供应链减排博弈中,在碳税规制约束下分析了零售商无公平偏好、制造商考虑零售商公平偏好、制造商不考虑零售商公平偏好三种情况下的供应链减排与定价问题。研究发现:产品减排量与零售商公平偏好负相关,即零售商公平偏好在一定程度上阻碍了产品减排。因此,需要政府宣传低碳产品的优势,使零售商将关注焦点由利润分配的公平性转移到产品的低碳情况上,从而降低其公平偏好,促进产品减排;如果零售商具有公平偏好,此时制造商在决策中考虑其公平偏好的影响,能同时提高制造商和零售商的利润,从而实现双赢。

     

    Abstract: This paper introduces the retailers’ fairness preferences into the emission reduction game of the supply chain, and analyzes the supply chain emission reduction and pricing problems under carbon tax regulation in three cases; that is, the retailers have no fair preferences; the manufacturers take the retailers’ fair preferences into account; and the manufacturers do not consider the retailers’ fair preferences. The results show that product emission reduction is negatively correlated with the retailers’ fairness preferences, which means that the retailers’ fair preferences hinder product emission reduction to a certain extent. Therefore, it is necessary for the government to publicize the advantages of low-carbon products, so that the retailers can shift their focus from the fairness of profit distribution to the low-carbon feature of the products, thus reducing their fairness preferences and promoting the emission reduction of the products. If the retailers have fair preferences, the manufacturers should consider the impact of the retailers’ fairness preferences in their decision-making, which can improve the profits of both the manufacturers and retailers to achieve a win-win situation.

     

/

返回文章
返回