ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
张莉琼, 肖长睿. 论重大飞行事故的判断方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0109
引用本文: 张莉琼, 肖长睿. 论重大飞行事故的判断方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0109
ZHANG Liqiong, XIAO Changrui. Judgment Methods of Major Flight Accident[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0109
Citation: ZHANG Liqiong, XIAO Changrui. Judgment Methods of Major Flight Accident[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0109

论重大飞行事故的判断方法

Judgment Methods of Major Flight Accident

  • 摘要: 理解可能性、预测可能性与经司法审查确认性的三级逐层排除阶梯式方法是重大飞行事故罪是否符合明确性原则的判断方法。理解可能性和预测可能性的缺失使得“重大飞行事故”的判断方法成为中国刑法理论和实务中的难题,应当在凯尔森实证法学派的基础上,按照合规范性、合刑性和合宪性的位阶顺序逐层深入对“重大飞行事故”进行解释,“重大飞行事故”应作为客观的结果要素被解释为“五千万元及以上直接经济损失”,“造成严重后果”应作为内在客观处罚条件被解释为“五十人及以上重伤”。

     

    Abstract: The ladder method of three-level exclusion confirmed by understanding possibility, predicting possibility and the refinement of judicature is the method to judge whether crime of major flight accident complies with the principle of clarity. The lack of understanding possibility and predicting possibility makes the judgment method of “major flight accident” a problem for the theoretical and practical circles of criminal law in China. On the basis of Kelsen's positive law school, we should explain the “major flight accident” level by layer in accordance with the order of standardization, punishment and constitution. “Major flight accident” should be interpreted as “50 million yuan or more direct economic loss” as an objective result element, and “causing serious consequences” should be interpreted as “serious injury of 50 people or more” as an internal objective punishment condition.

     

/

返回文章
返回