ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
李轩. 区块链赋能政府数据开放的风险及其规制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0703
引用本文: 李轩. 区块链赋能政府数据开放的风险及其规制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0703
LI Xuan. Risk of Government Data Opening Empowered by Blockchain and Its Regulation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0703
Citation: LI Xuan. Risk of Government Data Opening Empowered by Blockchain and Its Regulation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0703

区块链赋能政府数据开放的风险及其规制

Risk of Government Data Opening Empowered by Blockchain and Its Regulation

  • 摘要: 政府数据开放是数智时代政府的新型行政任务,但现行中心化开放模式难以兼顾数据安全性和数据可用性的双重需要。区块链赋能政府数据开放是大数据时代的必然趋势,以共识机制提升政府数据的互信性、以加密算法保障数据安全性和以智能合约增强数据可用性。但作为一种新兴技术,区块链具有赋能效用也可能引发风险,包括区块链技术不完善引发的内部风险和与法律制度不适配引发的外部风险。对此,法律规制是可行进路。首先,针对区块链自身技术缺陷引发的内部风险,应当从法律层面构建区块链风险规制机制。其次,针对法律滞后性所引发区块链赋能的合规风险,应当建立沙盒监管等试错机制。再次,针对数据鸿沟所引发利益俘获风险,应当形成多元共治的数据治理体系。

     

    Abstract: Government data opening is a new administrative task of the government in the digital smart era, but the current centralized opening model is difficult to meet the dual needs of data security and data availability. Government data opening empowered by blockchain is an inevitable trend in the era of big data. It improves the mutual trust of government data by consensus mechanism, ensures data security by encryption algorithm and enhances data availability by intelligent contracts. But as an emerging technology, the empowerment utility of blockchain can also trigger risks, including internal risks caused by imperfect blockchain technology and external risks caused by mismatch with legal systems. In this regard, legal regulation is a feasible way. First, in view of the internal risks caused by the blockchain enabling the government to open and share data, the blockchain risk regulation mechanism should be established from the legal level. Second, sandbox regulation and other trial-and-error mechanisms should be established for compliance risks enabled by blockchain due to legal lag. Thirdly, in view of the risk of interest capture caused by data gap, a multi-governance data governance system should be formed.

     

/

返回文章
返回