ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
薛俊强, 吴大娟. 马克思关于人的解放理论的政治哲学深蕴——以《德意志意识形态》中“现实的个人”分析为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 37(3): 8-15. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0944
引用本文: 薛俊强, 吴大娟. 马克思关于人的解放理论的政治哲学深蕴——以《德意志意识形态》中“现实的个人”分析为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 37(3): 8-15. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0944
XUE Junqiang, WU Dajuan. Political Philosophy Implication of Marx’s Theory of Human Liberation——Taking the Analysis of “Realistic Individual” in The German Ideology as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(3): 8-15. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0944
Citation: XUE Junqiang, WU Dajuan. Political Philosophy Implication of Marx’s Theory of Human Liberation——Taking the Analysis of “Realistic Individual” in The German Ideology as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(3): 8-15. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0944

马克思关于人的解放理论的政治哲学深蕴以《德意志意识形态》中“现实的个人”分析为例

Political Philosophy Implication of Marx’s Theory of Human LiberationTaking the Analysis of “Realistic Individual” in The German Ideology as an Example

  • 摘要: 在《德意志意识形态》中,马克思以对德国思辨唯心主义哲学抽象化叙事的批判为逻辑前提,主张把对“人”的理解从观念领域回归现实世界,将“现实的个人”置于具体社会历史进程给予分析,将现实个体及其阶级视为政治活动的主体,强调从“粗糙”的物质生产及其承载的社会关系层面把握“人”的本质属性。“现实的个人”是从事实际生产活动的感性力量,“人”在实践过程中将自身的本质力量外化、对象化为历史的发展。马克思指明,在资本主义政治国家和市民社会各自分裂的情形下,“人”被异化为二重化存在的现实,市民社会中的“人”是“现实的个人”,但也是非真实的;政治国家中的个人是真实的,但也是非现实的。资本主义社会关系下的“人”是异化的理性“工具人”,要实现人的个性解放与自由全面发展,必须摆脱唯心主义和非批判的经验主义意识形态的束缚,投入颠覆资本主义私有制的现实斗争之中,将“人”从市民社会的人提升至社会化的人类,进而真正实现每个人的自由而全面发展。

     

    Abstract: In The German Ideology, Marx advocated that the understanding of “human” should return to the secular world from the conceptual domain by taking the criticism of the abstract narrative of German speculative idealism philosophy as the logical premise. That is, he believed that “realistic individuals” should be placed in the specific social and historical process for analysis, and the realistic individuals and their classes should be regarded as the main subjects of political activities. He also emphasized that the essential attributes of “human” should be understood from the level of “rough” material production and the social relations it carries. “Realistic individuals” were the perceptual force engaged in actual production activities. In the process of practice, “human” externalized and objectified his own essential strength into historical development. Marx pointed out that under the circumstances of the separation between capitalist political state and civil society, “human” was alienated into the reality of dual existence, in which the humans in civil society were the realistic individuals, but they were not real, and the individuals in the political state were real, but they were unrealistic. “Human” under the capitalist social relationship was alienated rational “tool man”. In order to realize the liberation and free and all-round development of the humans, it is necessary to get rid of the shackles of idealism and non-critical empiricism ideology and to engage in the realistic struggle to subvert capitalist private ownership, so that the humans can be elevated from the “humans” in civil society to the socialized human beings, and then truly realize the freedom and development of everyone.

     

/

返回文章
返回