ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
张凤, 汤奥灵, 沈映春, 杜媛媛. 基于DEA模型的京沪深三地技术转移效率研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0987
引用本文: 张凤, 汤奥灵, 沈映春, 杜媛媛. 基于DEA模型的京沪深三地技术转移效率研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0987
ZHANG Feng, TANG Aoling, SHEN Yingchun, DU Yuanyuan. Comparative Study on Technology Transfer Efficiency of Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen Based on DEA Model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0987
Citation: ZHANG Feng, TANG Aoling, SHEN Yingchun, DU Yuanyuan. Comparative Study on Technology Transfer Efficiency of Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen Based on DEA Model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0987

基于DEA模型的京沪深三地技术转移效率研究

Comparative Study on Technology Transfer Efficiency of Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen Based on DEA Model

  • 摘要: 北京、上海、深圳作为中国重要的科技创新高地,对于中国创新发展与追赶具有重要战略意义。技术转移是创新的重要手段,对创新能力提升及经济发展有重要影响。基于2010—2020年京沪深的面板数据,建立DEA模型,测度三市技术转移效率,同时进行敏感度分析与投影值分析,发现三市均存在R&D经费投入过多和高新技术产品出口额不足的问题,北京还存在单位研发人员产出效率较低的问题,说明以大规模经费投入和人员投入的发展方式已经不适应于三市当今的发展阶段。针对以上结论,提出合理规划投入、增质提效,顺应双循环发展格局、先锋突破,聚焦重点要素、特色管理等政策建议。

     

    Abstract: Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, as the highland of science and technology innovation in China, have important strategic significance for innovation and development and catching up. Technology transfer is an important means of innovation and has an important impact on the improvement of innovation capabilities and economic development. Based on the panel data of Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2020, this paper establishes a DEA model to measure the technology transfer efficiency of the three cities and conducts sensitivity analysis and projection value analysis at the same time to analyze the similarities and differences of the three cities. In addition to the problem of insufficient export volume of high-tech products, Beijing still has the problem of low output efficiency of R&D personnel, indicating that the development method with large-scale capital investment and personnel investment is no longer suitable for the current development stage of the three cities. In response to the above conclusions, we put forward policy recommendations such as rational planning and investment, increasing quality and efficiency, conforming to the dual-cycle development pattern, pioneering breakthroughs, focusing on key elements, and characteristic management.

     

/

返回文章
返回