ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
吴亚女. 实体作为本原:论亚里士多德形而上学主题的统一性[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(4): 72-80, 96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.0520
引用本文: 吴亚女. 实体作为本原:论亚里士多德形而上学主题的统一性[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(4): 72-80, 96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.0520
WU Yanyu. Substance as Arche: On the Unity of the Themes of Aristotle’s Metaphysics[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(4): 72-80, 96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.0520
Citation: WU Yanyu. Substance as Arche: On the Unity of the Themes of Aristotle’s Metaphysics[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(4): 72-80, 96. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.0520

实体作为本原:论亚里士多德形而上学主题的统一性

Substance as Arche: On the Unity of the Themes of Aristotle’s Metaphysics

  • 摘要: 亚里士多德《形而上学》中存在论与神学之间的关系问题始终是学界争论的焦点。20世纪以来,以帕奇克−弗雷德为代表的核心意义解释提供了处理该问题的经典方案,该方案中特殊实体与一般实体之间的原因论关系需要得到进一步说明。作为《形而上学》中计划性的一卷的B卷,对此提供了关键思路:作为一门探究本原和原因的科学,形而上学处理的是本原如何普遍地作为存在物的原因,本原的必要条件是作为实体。从而,形而上学就可以同时处理与存在和实体相关的讨论,以及实体作为本原如何是其他存在者的原因这两个问题,将亚里士多德的探究统一在同一门科学之中。

     

    Abstract: The relationship between ontology and theology in Aristotle’s Metaphysics has always been a controversial issue among scholars. Since the 20th century, the focal meaning interpretation represented by Patzig-Frede has provided a classical scheme to tackle this problem, and the causal relationship between the special substance and the general substance in this scheme needs to be further explained. Book B, as the planned book of Metaphysics, provides a key idea for this: as a science of inquiry into arche and cause, metaphysics deals with how arche is generally the cause of being, and the necessary condition of arche is to be the substance. Metaphysics could thus simultaneously deal with the discussion of being and substance, and how substance, as arche, is the cause of other beings, thus unifying Aristotle’s inquiry in a single science.

     

/

返回文章
返回