ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
郑磊. 四大备案审查方式的制度化轨迹[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(5): 52-61. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.1101
引用本文: 郑磊. 四大备案审查方式的制度化轨迹[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 36(5): 52-61. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.1101
ZHENG Lei. Institutionalization Path of the Four Major Types of Recording and Review[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(5): 52-61. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.1101
Citation: ZHENG Lei. Institutionalization Path of the Four Major Types of Recording and Review[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 36(5): 52-61. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2023.1101

四大备案审查方式的制度化轨迹

Institutionalization Path of the Four Major Types of Recording and Review

  • 摘要: 2023年,是完善备案审查制度体系的一个标志性年份,其工作部署包括修改《中华人民共和国立法法》《中华人民共和国各级人民代表大会常务委员会监督法》,研究出台《全国人大常委会关于完善和加强备案审查制度的决定》。以审查方式为范例,分别从备案审查工作情况报告的相关内容体例中,梳理其工作实践逻辑和经验知识,从2019年《法规、司法解释备案审查工作办法》的审查方式章节中,凝练其工作机制内涵结构,从经由《中华人民共和国立法法》第二次修改实现全线入法的四类审查方式条款的修改比对中,揭示该法律制度的入法轨迹及其规范内涵。审查方式实现制度化的“工作实践—工作机制—法律规范”路径,可以成为宪法监督规范化、程序化一种典型路径,并为从中梳理凝练其规范内涵,提供阶段参考、载体参考等多方面借鉴。

     

    Abstract: The year 2023 is a key year for further improving the recording and review system, whose work deployment includes amending the Legislative Law of the People’s Republic of China and the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Supervision of Standing Committees of People’s Congresses at Various Levels, and studying and introducing the Decision of the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress on Improving and Strengthening the Recording and Review System. Taking the types of review as an example, the paper sorts out their logic of work practice and empirical knowledge respectively from the relevant contents of each annual report on the status of the recording and review work, and sums up the connotative structure of their work mechanism from the chapters on the types of review in Measures for the Recording and Review of Regulations and Judicial Interpretations in 2019. In addition, the paper reveals the track into law of the legal system and its normative connotation by comparing the amendments to the provisions of all four types of review types through the second amendment of the Legislative Law of the People’s Republic of China. The paper also finds that the path of “working practice-working mechanism-legal norms” for the institutionalization of the types of review can become a typical path for the normalization and proceduralization of the whole system of constitutional supervision, and provide phased reference and carrier reference for sorting out and summarizing their normative connotations.

     

/

返回文章
返回