ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
董扣艳. 治理现代化视域下思想政治教育媒介逻辑探赜[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2021.0475
引用本文: 董扣艳. 治理现代化视域下思想政治教育媒介逻辑探赜[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2021.0475
DONG Kouyan. Media Logic of Ideological and Political Education from the Perspective of Governance Modernization[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2021.0475
Citation: DONG Kouyan. Media Logic of Ideological and Political Education from the Perspective of Governance Modernization[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2021.0475

治理现代化视域下思想政治教育媒介逻辑探赜

Media Logic of Ideological and Political Education from the Perspective of Governance Modernization

  • 摘要: 思想政治教育治理现代化是国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的有机组成部分。在数字中国建设战略背景下,思想政治教育治理现代化的一个基本向度就是媒介化发展。在学理层面,思想政治教育治理现代化是促进实现人的现代化、维护意识形态安全、提升治理水平的必要环节,需要把握数字智能技术与思想政治教育治理现代化的耦合关系,阐释清楚技术赋能思想政治教育治理现代化的效度和限度。在实践层面,要克服“重价值、轻工具”和“重数据、轻人文”两种错误的技术认知倾向,着眼于理想信念、价值理念和道德观念等意识形态层面的问题,构建柔性的意识形态治理范式,提升意识形态治理的实效性。

     

    Abstract: The modernization of ideological and political education governance is an organic part of the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities. In the context of the digital China construction strategy, a basic dimension of the modernization of ideological and political education governance is the development of media. At the academic level, the modernization of ideological and political education governance is a necessary link to promote the realization of human modernization, maintain ideological security and improve governance. It is necessary to grasp the relationship between digital intelligent technology and modernization of ideological and political education governance, and explain the validity and limits of technology empowering ideological and political education governance modernization clearly. At the practical level, it is necessary to overcome two wrong technical cognition tendencies, including “valuing value and neglecting tools” and “valuing data and neglecting humanities”. Finally, it is necessary to construct a flexible ideological governance paradigm to enhance the effectiveness of ideological governance.

     

/

返回文章
返回