卢梭自由学说的双重性

详细信息

The Dual Nature of Rousseau’s Freedom Theory

School of Government and Law, Beijing Normal University Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519085, China

摘要: 卢梭的自由学说有别于其他人,他认为人类的各种束缚妨碍了自由。其所处时代的特色导致其学说的内在张力,内在分别从自然状态和完善社会组织这两个角度出发解除束缚,形成了具有双重性的自由学说,产生了无政府主义和整体主义两种不同的学说。这两种学说均从宇宙观、社会制度和个人三个层面来建构自己理想的自由状态。文章通过这个路径,分析了一个真正立体的卢梭所在。
- 自由 /
- 平等 /
- 无政府主义 /
- 整体主义 /
- 自由状态
Abstract: Different from others, Rousseau’s theory of freedom believes that the ties of h uman society impede the freedom. Because of the character of that period, his th eory leads to a paradox. He thinks there are two different ways which come from the nature stage and the good social organization to liberate the tie, which has led to anarchism and holism, the two different doctrines of freedom. Both the t wo different doctrines analyze from the epistemology, social constitution and th e individual to construct their stage of freedom. This article uses the vision t o analyze how the real Rousseau is.
- freedom /
- equality /
- anarchism /
- holism /
- stage of freed om

[1]	卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武译,北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[2]	J F 塔尔蒙. 极权主义民主的起源[M].孙传钊译. 长春:吉林人民出社,2004.43.
[3]	卢梭. 爱弥儿[M]. 李平沤译. 北京:人民教育出版社,2001.14-19.
[4]	卢梭. 论人类不平等的起源和基础[M].李常山译. 北京:商务印书馆,1982.132.
[5]	Edmund Burke. Thoughts on the Causes of the Prosout . Peter J Sta nlis. Discomtents from Selected Works of Edmund Burke . Regenery: Gateway, 1 963.123.
[6]	Brucee. Frohnen. Virtue and the Conservatism[M]. Salina: University Press of Kansas,1993.57.
[7]	马斯泰罗内.欧洲政治思想史[M].黄华光译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1992.359.
[8]	Michael Freeman. Edmund Burke and the Critique of Political R adicalism[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.29.
[9]	Rostow W W. Politics and the Stages of Growths[M]. Cambridge: Cambr idge University Press,1971.257.
[10]	范时杰. 整体主义与极权主义关系辨析 . 赵实,范时杰,纪灵,等.社会科学创新与发展探索研究 . 北京:中国人事出版社,2004.86.