ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
沈志韬. 论国际航空货运代理人法律地位[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2011, 24(2): 30-34.
引用本文: 沈志韬. 论国际航空货运代理人法律地位[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2011, 24(2): 30-34.
Shen Zhitao. Comments on the Legal Status of International Air Freight Forwarder[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2011, 24(2): 30-34.
Citation: Shen Zhitao. Comments on the Legal Status of International Air Freight Forwarder[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2011, 24(2): 30-34.

论国际航空货运代理人法律地位

Comments on the Legal Status of International Air Freight Forwarder

  • 摘要: 如今的国际航空货物运输实践中,货运代理人已逐渐突破了传统的定义,以代理人、缔约承运人等身份参与航空运输。不能一概将货运代理人认定为传统意义上的代理人,而应当结合航空货运单、当事人间合同的具体规定、货运代理人履行合同的实际情况、货运代理人收取合同对价的方式以及当事人的交易惯例等因素,综合判断货运代理人的身份并确定其法律责任。中国《民用航空法》规定,公共运输企业才能成为缔约承运人,这样的规定不利于明晰货运代理人的真实身份。

     

    Abstract: In the practice of international air cargo transport, the freight forwarder is likely to play both the role of traditional agent and that of contracting carrier. The freight forwarder shall not be identified as a traditional agent arbitrarily; the legal status of freight forwarder shall be decided with reference to different factors such as the air waybill, the specific provisions of the contract between the parties, the freight forwarder’s actual performance of the contract, the way of freight forwarder to receive the contract price and the past trade practice between the parties. China-s "Civil Aviation" provides that only public transport enterprise is qualified to play the role of contracting carrier in air cargo transport; such a provision is not conducive to clarifying the actual identity of freight forwarders.

     

/

返回文章
返回