ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
陈浩. 《克罗茨纳赫笔记》与三种社会形态理论[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(1): 68-72.
引用本文: 陈浩. 《克罗茨纳赫笔记》与三种社会形态理论[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(1): 68-72.
Chen Hao. Kreuznach Notebooks and Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(1): 68-72.
Citation: Chen Hao. Kreuznach Notebooks and Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(1): 68-72.

《克罗茨纳赫笔记》与三种社会形态理论

Kreuznach Notebooks and Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory

  • 摘要: 马克思在写作《黑格尔法哲学批判》的同时,曾一度伴随以政治历史为关注对象的《克罗茨纳赫笔记》的摘抄工作,进而从理论上将《黑格尔法哲学批判》分作前后两个部分,其中后半部分的理论水平要明显高于前半部分;换句话说,得益于《克罗茨纳赫笔记》的政治历史研究工作,《黑格尔法哲学批判》的后半部分,业已包含了迟至《政治经济学批判大纲》才得到明确表述的,相对强调个体自由的"三种社会形态理论"的雏形。

     

    Abstract: Marx's writing of Critique of Hegel's Philosophy is accompanied with the excerpting of Kreuznach Notebooks concentrating on political theory and history, which divide Critique into two different part—the latter half has surpassed the first half in theoretical level. In other words, due to Notebooks' historical investigation, the latter half of Critique has contained the embryonic form of "Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory", which lays its emphasis on the significance of individual freedom and has not gained its complete development and clear expounding until Outline of Critique of Political Economy.

     

/

返回文章
返回