ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
傅前明. 气候变化立法动向分析及中国对策——以国际民航业减排为视角[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(5): 50-55.
引用本文: 傅前明. 气候变化立法动向分析及中国对策——以国际民航业减排为视角[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(5): 50-55.
Fu Qianming. Studies on International Climate Change Legislation Trend and Chinese Countermeasures:from the View of the GHG Reduction of International Aviation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(5): 50-55.
Citation: Fu Qianming. Studies on International Climate Change Legislation Trend and Chinese Countermeasures:from the View of the GHG Reduction of International Aviation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(5): 50-55.

气候变化立法动向分析及中国对策——以国际民航业减排为视角

Studies on International Climate Change Legislation Trend and Chinese Countermeasures:from the View of the GHG Reduction of International Aviation

  • 摘要: 选取欧盟实施2008第101号指令作为研究对象,采用原因分析、目的分析、合法性分析的方法,对欧盟充任"气候领袖"、引领国际气候谈判的战术、战略和效果进行了评估。结果表明,欧盟充分利用《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》所规定的体制和机制,以推进国际民航减排为突破口,成功地将国际碳减排压力引向中、美等国,且极大地削弱了"共同但有区别责任"原则的国际法律力量,从而为其布局2012年后国际气候立法安排赢得了主动权。而中国民航产业发展以及中国谈判基本立场均受到了强烈的冲击,中国亟需从维护国家战略利益的高度进行科学应对。

     

    Abstract: The paper selected DIRECTIVE 2008/101/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL as the study object, adopted the cause analysis method, the objective analysis method, and the validity analysis method, and evaluated the European Union-s tactics, strategies and the effects. The research results indicated that the EU had made full use of the mechanisms and systems in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol, promoted international aviation emissions reduction, weakened the law efficacy of the "common but differentiated responsibilities" principle, transferred the international reduction pressure into the countries such as China and the United States. Also the EU had won the initiative of the international climate legislation arrangement. And China's civil aviation industry and the basic negotiation positions were strongly impacted. So China needs to safeguard its national strategic interests from the highly scientific point.

     

/

返回文章
返回