ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Sun Qixin, Zheng Xiaoqi. Reflections on Criticism of Instructional Design Technical Rationality[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2015, 28(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0496
Citation: Sun Qixin, Zheng Xiaoqi. Reflections on Criticism of Instructional Design Technical Rationality[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2015, 28(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0496

Reflections on Criticism of Instructional Design Technical Rationality

  • There is some reason in instructional design technical rationality, but there are also misunderstandings: some people misunderstand mediatechnology which features multimedia technology and network technologyand routinization and controllability of teaching modelas the representatives of the technical rationality of instructional design. This reflectsnarrow understanding of technique and technical rationality on the part of the critics. Settinginstrumental rationality and value rationality of the instructional design technique in complete opposition will result in a lack of dialectical unification. Instructional design technique requires rational criticism and deep reflection. It is important to redefine the concept of instructional design technique through the binding of characteristics and functions of technical rationality. The significance of the reconstruction lies in two aspects: theoretical guidance and practical valuefor the professional development of teachers.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return