Citation: | PENG Feng, DING Jialan. Study of Climate Disclosure Rules in the United States: Based on Scope 3 Emissions Disputes[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2024.0773 |
On March 6th 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted and published Rules to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors, which against the backdrop of increasing global attention to the issue of climate change. Influenced by the deepening integration of environmental culture into social life, the high level of investor and stakeholder interest in climate issues, and the urgent need for a common standard for reporting companies and the marketplace, the issuance of the rule responds to market and social needs in the face of the strong interest in climate-related disclosure issues among companies of all sizes and from a wide range of industries. The final published version of the rule eliminates the mandatory reporting requirement for Scope 3 emissions in favour of voluntary disclosure, making a compromise with "registrants" by eliminating the mandatory reporting requirement for Scope 3 emissions. Although the final rule is more lenient, it will still exert great pressure on Chinese enterprises going to the United States. Both enterprises and the government need to prepare for a rainy day. For the government, it can comprehensively coordinate and macroscopically layout to help relevant enterprises to smoothly comply with the climate information disclosure issue. For enterprises, they should accelerate the layout of their internal compliance management framework and make good preparations for climate risk response and climate-related information disclosure.
[1] |
赵斌, 谢淑敏. 重返《巴黎协定》:美国拜登政府气候政治新变化[J]. 和平与发展, 2021(3): 37-58.
|
[2] |
沈洪涛, 王立彦, 万拓. 社会责任报告及鉴证能否传递有效信号?——基于企业声誉理论的分析[J]. 审计研究, 2011(4): 87-93.
|
[3] |
何贤杰, 肖土盛, 陈信元. 企业社会责任信息披露与公司融资约束[J]. 财经研究, 2012, 38(8): 60-71.
|
[4] |
张璇, 林友威, 张红霞. 基于中国上市公司样本的企业社会责任与企业市场价值关系的实证研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(7): 1088-1096.
|
[5] |
李力, 刘全齐, 唐登莉. 碳绩效、碳信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(1): 221-235.
|
[6] |
董江春, 孙维章, 陈智. 国际ESG标准制定:进展、问题与建议[J]. 财会通讯, 2022(19): 147-153.
|
[7] |
叶丰滢, 黄世忠. SEC气候信息披露新规的解读与分析[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(12): 26-34.
|
[8] |
谈多娇, 胡志鹏. 碳排放核算与碳绩效评价——以“范围三”为研究对象[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(13): 78-81.
|
[9] |
CDP. Scoping out: Tracking nature across the supply chain [EB/OL]. (2023−03−01)[2024−05−08].
|
[10] |
RADONJIČ G, TOMPA S. Carbon footprint calculation in telecommunications companies—The importance and relevance of scope 3 greenhouse gases emissions [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 98: 361-375.
|
[11] |
DOWNIE J, STUBBS W. Corporate carbon strategies and greenhouse gas emission assessments: The implications of scope 3 emission factor selection [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2012, 21: 412-422.
|
[12] |
科菲, 李高宇, 罗大千. 给SEC气候相关信息披露草案打几分?[J]. 董事会, 2023(Z1): 94-97.
|
[13] |
黄世忠. ESG报告的“漂绿”与反“漂绿”[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(1): 3-11.
|
[14] |
习近平. 在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话(2020年9月22日, 北京)[N]. 人民日报, 2020−09−23(3).
|
[15] |
财新智库, 中国ESG30人论坛. 2023中国ESG发展白皮书[EB/OL]. (2023−11−20)[2024−05−08].
|
[16] |
中国上市公司协会. 中上协统计月报(2023年12月)[EB/OL]. (2023−12−01)[2024−05−08]. ).pdf.
|
[17] |
沈洪涛. “双碳”目标下我国碳信息披露问题研究[J]. 会计之友, 2022(9): 2-9.
|
[18] |
吴勋, 徐新歌. 企业碳信息披露质量评价研究——来自资源型上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(13): 229-233.
|
[19] |
BAINES T, CARPENTERD, DE BERNIERP, et al. US Appeals Court temporarily halts SEC'S Climate Change Disclosure Rules [EB/OL]. (2024−03−22)[2024−05−09].
|