Citation: | DU Qun, LI Jing. Regulatory Features and Institutional Construction of the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2024.2457 |
On the issue of national legislation on climate change, there are two options in China, namely the “Law on Responding to Climate Change” and the “Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral Law”. Based on China’s actual situation and foreign experience, the Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral Law, which can better achieve the goals of carbon emission reduction, green and low-carbon development and the value rationality of just transition, is a more necessary and feasible choice. It shall be legislatively designated as the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act, with this title constituting its statutory nomenclature. The Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act embodies pluralistic legislative regulatory features: the hierarchical objectives of direct, indirect and long-term goals, and presents the multiple functions of specialized regulation, synergistic regulation and accountability regulation, as well as the normative expression of different effects determined by the regulatory content. In constructing the institutional system of the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act, its legislative regulatory features should be transformed into a legislative expression programme for the legal system. That is, formulating the specialised legal regime for goal orientation, process control and evaluation of results, and fair transition safeguards, and the chimeric legal regime for project carbon evaluation, realization of the value of ecological products from carbon sinks, and safeguarding funds for the green and low-carbon transition, as well as the consequentialist legal regime.
[1] |
王莉. 我国环境法律制度的结构性转向:从行政规制到规制治理[J]. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 66(6): 124-137.
|
[2] |
新华网. 习近平在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2020−09−22)[2024−06−14].
|
[3] |
徐以祥, 刘继琛. 论碳达峰碳中和的法律制度构建[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3): 20-31.
|
[4] |
朱志昊. 从价值预设到法律形式:立法方法论基础初探[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 51(4): 66.
|
[5] |
Climate Change Act 2008 [EB/OL]. [2024−10−15].
|
[6] |
Parliament of Canada. An Act respecting transparency and accountability in Canada’s efforts to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050 [EB/OL]. (2021−06−29)[2024−11−19].
|
[7] |
宁立标, 杨晓迪. 公正过渡:“双碳”背景下中国绿色转型的规制理路[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 36(2): 150.
|
[8] |
欧洲改革中心分析欧盟绿色政策受到阻力的原因[EB/OL]. (2024−01−16)[2025−03−09].
|
[9] |
朱明哲. 发展型国家气候法治的结构与挑战[J]. 法大法律评论, 2024(1): 37-57.
|
[10] |
吴凯杰. 环境法体系中的应对气候变化立法[J]. 法治社会, 2023(6): 13-26.
|
[11] |
李艳芳, 张忠利, 李程. 我国应对气候变化立法的若干思考[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 33(1): 1-12.
|
[12] |
王国飞. 论气候法的新兴部门法地位[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2024(7): 133-142.
|
[13] |
王操. 碳中和立法:何以可能与何以可为[J]. 东方法学, 2022(6): 185-198.
|
[14] |
徐以祥. 论我国环境法律的体系化[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(3): 83-95.
|
[15] |
王灿发, 刘哲. 论我国应对气候变化立法模式的选择[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2015(6): 113-121.
|
[16] |
刘风景. 法律名称的功能定位及设置优化[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(1): 137-149.
|
[17] |
专访全国政协常委吕忠梅:用法律保障实现碳达峰碳中 和[EB/OL].(2021−03−08)[2024−6−15].
|
[18] |
胡建. 论碳中和专项立法及其可行性[J]. 城市与环境研究, 2023(4): 80-93.
|
[19] |
赛德曼. 立法服务手册[M]. 赵庆培、杨华, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1992: 137.
|
[20] |
斯科特. 规制、治理与法律:前沿问题研究[M], 安永康, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 3.
|
[21] |
戴昕. 威慑补充与“赔偿减刑”[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(3): 129.
|
[22] |
杨姗姗, 郭豪, 杨秀, 等. 双碳目标下建立碳排放总量控制制度的思考与展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(2): 191-202.
|
[23] |
潘晓滨. 碳中和背景下国家碳预算的理论同构与立法路径[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 38(1): 112-118.
|
[24] |
杨博文. 我国实施碳排放“双控”的渐进逻辑、转型部署及制度取向[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(7): 105-116.
|
[25] |
何艳秋, 倪方平, 钟秋波. 中国碳排放统计核算体系基本框架的构建[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2015, 30(1): 35-36.
|
[26] |
中国日报网. 巴库气候大会就《巴黎协定》第六条取得关键进展[EB/OL]. (2024−11−13)[2024−11−27].
|
[27] |
Gov. UK. Net zero strategy: Build back greener [EB/OL]. (2022−04−05)[2025−03−02].
|
[28] |
王社坤. 论我国碳评价制度的构建[J]. 北方法学, 2022, 16(2): 27-36.
|
[29] |
周佳, 董战峰. 碳汇产品价值实现机制与路径[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(11): 98-104.
|
[30] |
刘颖, 丁霖. 生态系统碳汇的法律概念及其权利构造[J/OL]. 中国人口 • 资源与环境, 2024, (5): 92-101.
|
[31] |
王明远, 张金晓. 气候变化责任体系研究[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(5): 47-56.
|