CHEN Dong-yu, QIU Wan-hua, YANG Min, LIANG Mei-rong. Task Flow Optimization and Risk Simulation Model of Complex Construction Proje[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 8-12.
Citation:
CHEN Dong-yu, QIU Wan-hua, YANG Min, LIANG Mei-rong. Task Flow Optimization and Risk Simulation Model of Complex Construction Proje[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 8-12.
CHEN Dong-yu, QIU Wan-hua, YANG Min, LIANG Mei-rong. Task Flow Optimization and Risk Simulation Model of Complex Construction Proje[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 8-12.
Citation:
CHEN Dong-yu, QIU Wan-hua, YANG Min, LIANG Mei-rong. Task Flow Optimization and Risk Simulation Model of Complex Construction Proje[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 8-12.
In order to effectively manage the schedule and cost of complex construction pro jects, an algorithm is developed to optimize task flows. This algorithms uses De sign Structuring Matrix as the basic analysis tool, and optimizes the task flow through reorganizing the tasks execution sequence. As learning curve will play a n important role in the completion of complex project, this paper also takes thi s factor into consideration. The simulation results in the case study indicates that it is quite effective for projects with high task interactions, and the lea rning curve will pose a significant effect upon project cost and schedule.
Steward D V. The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the D esign of Complex Systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1981 , 28: 71-74.
[3]
Eppinger S D, Whitney D, Smith R P. A Model Based Method for Organizi ng Tasks in Product Development[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 1994,6:1- 13.
[4]
Browning T R, Eppinger S D. Modeling Impacts of Process Architecture on Cost and Schedule Risk in Product Development[J]. IEEE Transactions on Eng ineering Management, 2002,49(4): 428-443.
[5]
Ali Yassine D B. Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Struct ure Matrix Method[J]. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2003, 11(3): 165-177.
[6]
Abdelsalam H M E. Optimization Based Architecture for Managing Compl ex Integrated Product Development Project . Norfolk: Dominion University, 2 003: 69-108.
[7]
Li L, Shi-Jie C. Decomposition of Interdependent Task Group for Con current Engineering[J]. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2003,44:435-459.
[8]
Zhang H P, Qiu W H. An Approach to Measuring Coupled Tasks Strength and Sequencing of Coupled Tasks in New Product Development[J]. Concurrent Engi neering: Research and Application, 2006, 14(4).
[9]
Cho S H, Eppinger S D. Product Development Process Modeling Using Ad vanced Simulation . Proceedings of DETC'01 ASME 2001 Design Engineering Tech nical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference . Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania State University, 2001. 1-10.
DownLoad: