CHEN Yu. Compensation in International Aviation Transport[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 36-42.
Citation:
CHEN Yu. Compensation in International Aviation Transport[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 36-42.
CHEN Yu. Compensation in International Aviation Transport[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 36-42.
Citation:
CHEN Yu. Compensation in International Aviation Transport[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2008, 21(2): 36-42.
Warsaw Convention System is a successful model of applying international laws by the adoption of substantial rules. Warsaw Convention System constituted by Wars aw Convention 1929 and its subsequent amendment files endeavors to harmonize the conflicts arising from the international aviation transport and to build up a g lobally recognized files-system. The compensation under Warsaw Convention Syste m involves the divarication as to the causes of action in Common Law legislation , particularly in USA. The important bifurcation in both theory and judicial pra ctice connected to the mental compensation and punitive compensation becomes a c lue of the integration and modernization of the Warsaw Convention.
Georgette Miller. Liability In International Air Transport-T he Warsaw System in Municipal Courts[M]. Hague: Kluwer, 1977.
[2]
Robert P Boyle. The Warsaw Convention-Past, Present and Future, Ess ays in Air Law[M]. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982. 2.
[3]
Dieferiks-Verschoor L H Ph. The Liability for Delay in Air Trasport [J]. A&SL, 2001,XXVI:6.
[4]
Ruwantissa I R Abeyratne. Aviation Trends in the New Milliennium[M] . London: Ashgate, 2001. 247.
[5]
Marks I M. Fears and Phobias[M]. London: William Heinemann Medical Books, 1969. 1.
[6]
Andrew J Harakas. Punitive Damages Under the Warsaw Convention After Zicherman[J]. A&SL, 1997, XXII-I.
[7]
Kreindler L. Zicherman-Methodology in International Accidents[J]. NYLJ, 1996, (216): 3.
[8]
Drion H. Limitation of Liability in International Air Law[M]. Hague :Martinus Nijhoff, 1954.1-13.
[9]
Bin Cheng. Centrifugal Tendencies in Air Law[J]. Current Legal Prob lems, 1957, (10).
[10]
Lacey. Recent Developments in the Warsaw Convention[J]. J ALC, 1967, (33).
[11]
Lowenfeld and Mendelsohn. The United States and the Warsaw Conventio n[J]. HLR, 1967, (80).
[12]
Sozer. Consolidation of The Warsaw/Hague System[J]. McGill LJ, 197 9, (25).
[13]
Ludwig Weber, Arie Jakob. Reforming the Warsaw System[J]. A&SL, 1 996,Vol XXI.
[14]
Martin. 50 Years of The Warsaw Convention: A Practical Man's Guide . A&SL, 1979, (4).
[15]
Bin Cheng. Air Carrier's Liability for Passenger Injury or Death: Th e Japanese Initiative and Response to the Recent EC Consultation Paper[J]. A & SL, 1993, (18).
[16]
Dieferiks-Verschoor L H. The Liability for Delay in Air Trasport . A&SL, 2001, Vol. XXVI.
[17]
Cobbs L. The shifting meaning of 'Accident' under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention[J]. A&SL, 1999, 24.
[18]
Andrew J Harakas. Interpretation the Warsaw Convention: Zicherman v . Korean Air Lines[J]. A&SL, 1996, Vol.XXI-II.
[19]
Judith R Karp. Mile High Assaults: Air Carrier Liability Under the Warsaw Convention[J]. JA&C, 2001, (66).
DownLoad: