ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
YANG Jian-cheng, JI Quan-ling. Risk Society and "Excessively-blamed Government" Predicament[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 26-29.
Citation: YANG Jian-cheng, JI Quan-ling. Risk Society and "Excessively-blamed Government" Predicament[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 26-29.

Risk Society and "Excessively-blamed Government" Predicament

More Information
  • Received Date: March 10, 2009
  • Published Date: June 24, 2009
  • In the crisis society, human beings will be confronted with more uncertainties a nd produce more crises because of the limitation of knowledge. Yet it is difficu lt to determine the responsibilities for the crises in today’s elaborately labo r-divided society as a result of "common conspiracy", which leads to "organi zed irresponsibility". Therefore, the government will unavoidably face more unp reventable public crises as well as the impediment to find out the real trouble -makers who should take the responsibilities. As a result, under the State-cen tered governance pattern, the government will fall into the predicament of being excessively-blamed. A common governance pattern with the cooperation between t he country, market and civil society is a solution for the government breaking a way from the predicament and transforming into a "service-oriented government ".
  • [1] 乌尔里奇·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻译. 南京:译林出版社,2004.20.
    [2] 乌尔里奇·贝克. 从工业社会到风险社会[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2003,(3):27.
    [3] 周战超. 当代西方风险社会理论引述[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2003,(3):56.
    [4] 安东尼·吉登斯.失控的世界[M]. 周红云译. 南昌:江西人民出版社,2001.22.
    [5] Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity[M]. London: Sage,1992.33.
    [6] Beck U. Risk Society and the Provident State . Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology . London:Sa ge,1996.31.
    [7] 杨雪冬. 风险社会与秩序重建[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社,2006.67.
    [8] 张海波. 风险社会与公共危机[J]. 江海学刊,2006,(2):112-117.
    [9] 安东尼·吉登斯. 现代性的后果[M]. 田禾译. 南京:译林出版社,2000.115.
    [10] 乌尔里奇·贝克. 风险社会再思考[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2002,(4):5 0.
    [11] 李丹阳. 两难抉择与政府职能转变[J]. 学术研究,2008,(3):83-84.
    [12] 杨雪冬. 风险社会与秩序重建[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.

Catalog

    Article views (2003) PDF downloads (1261) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return