FAN Shi-jie. The Dual Nature of Rousseau’s Freedom Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 47-52.
Citation:
FAN Shi-jie. The Dual Nature of Rousseau’s Freedom Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 47-52.
FAN Shi-jie. The Dual Nature of Rousseau’s Freedom Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 47-52.
Citation:
FAN Shi-jie. The Dual Nature of Rousseau’s Freedom Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 47-52.
Different from others, Rousseau’s theory of freedom believes that the ties of h uman society impede the freedom. Because of the character of that period, his th eory leads to a paradox. He thinks there are two different ways which come from the nature stage and the good social organization to liberate the tie, which has led to anarchism and holism, the two different doctrines of freedom. Both the t wo different doctrines analyze from the epistemology, social constitution and th e individual to construct their stage of freedom. This article uses the vision t o analyze how the real Rousseau is.
Edmund Burke. Thoughts on the Causes of the Prosout . Peter J Sta nlis. Discomtents from Selected Works of Edmund Burke . Regenery: Gateway, 1 963.123.
[6]
Brucee. Frohnen. Virtue and the Conservatism[M]. Salina: University Press of Kansas,1993.57.
[7]
马斯泰罗内.欧洲政治思想史[M].黄华光译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1992.359.
[8]
Michael Freeman. Edmund Burke and the Critique of Political R adicalism[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.29.
[9]
Rostow W W. Politics and the Stages of Growths[M]. Cambridge: Cambr idge University Press,1971.257.