ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Wang Yuhuan. Justice,Efficiency and the Justification of the State: Christopher W Morris- Theory of Justifying the State[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(2): 12-15.
Citation: Wang Yuhuan. Justice,Efficiency and the Justification of the State: Christopher W Morris- Theory of Justifying the State[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(2): 12-15.

Justice,Efficiency and the Justification of the State: Christopher W Morris- Theory of Justifying the State

More Information
  • Received Date: March 14, 2011
  • Published Date: March 24, 2012
  • Each of us lives in a modern state but there is a challenge from the anarchists that whether the state should exist or not, that is, whether justify the state? If we agree that can justify the state, what is the basis of justification of the state? Christopher W Morris argued that justifying the state is to certify that the power of justification of the state is just, right or reasonable. In face of the difficulty in justifying the state in the theories of Locke and Nozick which is the dilemma of justifying the state so long as we agree individuals have the rights of life, liberty and property. The way to deal with this dilemma of Morris is to make use of the concept of seminatural rights and in order to protect the seminatural rights of individuals the sate needs to provide justice and take actions effectively. Consequently, Morris justifies the state by way of the conceptions of justice and efficiency.
  • [1] David Schmidtz. Justifying the state[J]. Ethics,1990,101(1):90.
    [2] Simmons A John. Justification and legitimacy[J]. Ethics,1999,109(4).
    [3] Christopher W Morris. An essay on the modern state[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998.
    [4] 王宇环.证成与正当性:洛克路径与康德路径的对垒[J].北京航空航天大学学报:社会科学版,2009(1):34-37.
    [5] 王宇环.权利与国家证成——诺齐克的证成国家路径[J].长春市委党校学报,2008(1):63-65.
    [6] David Miller. The justification of political authority[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002:10-33.
    [7] Jonathan Wolff. An introduction to political philosophy[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996:42.
    [8] 罗伯特·诺齐克. 无政府、国家与乌托邦[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
    [9] 霍布斯. 利维坦[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1985.
    [10] 周光辉,殷冬水. 政府:一个公正社会不可或缺的角色——关于政府再分配职能正当性的思考[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报,2006(4):5-14.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Yaning. Civil Aero-Engine Rights Registration System[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(3): 166-176. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0502
    [2]LI Dapeng. Status Quo, Problem and Development of Property Rights of Aircraft in Chinese Law[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(3): 158-165. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1181
    [3]MA Wanli. "Curriculum-Project" Engineering Talents Training: Cases of MIT and Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 34(6): 148-155. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0292
    [4]YANG Li, WANG Xiaoyu, SUN Xinqiang. Meta-analysis of Rights Conflict: Based on CSSCI Data, 1983-2013[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(2): 154-162. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0017
    [5]LIU Lijun. Rights of Donors of Social Service Institutions[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(1): 8-14. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0383
    [6]LIU Chengtao. On Information Disclosure and Non-profit Organizations Insurance of Property Rights[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 29(1): 76-81. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0391
    [7]Gao Pengcheng. On Power Configuration of Governance of Public Institutions' Land Use Rights as State-owned Assets[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2015, 28(6): 20-23. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0440
    [8]Li Chunlin. Comments on Alston-Petersmann Debate on Trade and Human Rights[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(5): 54-62. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0057
    [9]WANG Yu-huan. Teleological Justification and Emergent Justification: Two Ways of Justifying the States Summarized by David Schmidtz[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 53-55.
    [10]WANG Yu-huan. Justification and Legitimacy: Lockean Approach VS Kantian Approach[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(1): 34-37.

Catalog

    Article views (1134) PDF downloads (854) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return