ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Zhu Changbing. Discussing the Relationship between Three Logics: as the View of the Relationship between Form and Content[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(2): 77-81.
Citation: Zhu Changbing. Discussing the Relationship between Three Logics: as the View of the Relationship between Form and Content[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(2): 77-81.

Discussing the Relationship between Three Logics: as the View of the Relationship between Form and Content

More Information
  • Received Date: October 11, 2011
  • Published Date: March 24, 2012
  • The traditional formal logic, the Kant?s transcendental logic and speculative logic all study the thought forms. All of them are the generalized formal logic. Because the thought forms and the thought contents have not been truly unified in the first two kinds of logic, the thought forms are not the true thought forms. Thus the first two kinds of logic are not the true formal logic. As the thought form and the thought content have been truly unified in speculative logic, the thought form is the true thought form. Thus speculative logic is the true formal logic. The article also discusses the attitude of the three kinds of logic on the law of non-contradiction of traditional formal laws, which further clarifies the relationship between the three kinds of logic.
  • [1] 亚里士多德. 亚里士多德全集:第1卷[M].苗力田,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990:3.
    [2] 康德.逻辑学讲义[M].许景行,译.北京:商务印书馆,1991:11.
    [3] 黑格尔. 逻辑学:上卷[M].杨一之,译.北京:商务印书馆,1966:24.
    [4] 康德. 纯粹理性批判[M].邓晓芒,译.北京:人民出版社,2004.
    [5] 黑格尔.精神现象学:上卷[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1979:60.
    [6] 黑格尔.逻辑学:下卷[M].杨一之,译.北京:商务印书馆,1976:531.
    [7] 黑格尔.小逻辑[M]. 贺麟,译.北京:商务印书馆,1980:182.

Catalog

    Article views (1081) PDF downloads (887) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return