Advanced Search
ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Yao Xiaodong. The Gricean Notion of Cooperative Hierarchy Revisited[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(4): 86-91.
Citation: Yao Xiaodong. The Gricean Notion of Cooperative Hierarchy Revisited[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(4): 86-91.
shu

The Gricean Notion of Cooperative Hierarchy Revisited

  • School of Foreign Languages, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information
  • Received Date: February 24, 2011
  • Published Date: July 24, 2012
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Quarrels on Grice’s notion of cooperative principle have never ceased. The underlying reason lies in the lack of a clear and systemic classification of, and the disagreement on, the levels or types of cooperation. Comparisons and evaluations are made in this study to show their respective strong points and weak points, with pros and cons offered. The notion cooperation is not employed by Grice in a sole and distinct sense. The study shows that different types or levels co-exist in the notion of cooperation.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (35)
  • [1] Kasher A. Conversational maxims and rationality[M]//Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976: 197-216.
    [2] Wilson D, Sperber D. On Grice’s theory of conversation[M]//Werth P. Conversation and Discourse. London: Croom Helm, 1981: 155-178.
    [3] Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1986-1995: 36,271,274.
    [4] 钱冠连. 汉语文化语用学[M]. 2版. 北京:清华大学出版社,2002:152.
    [5] 冯光武. 合作必须是原则[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2005(5):108-113.
    [6] 程雨民. 关于"会话含义"的两点探讨[J]. 暨南大学华文学院学报,2009(3):53.
    [7] Attardo S. Competition and cooperation: beyond Gricean pragmatics[J]. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1997(1).
    [8] Grice P. Studies in the way of words [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
    [9] Mey J L. Pragmatics: an introduction [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001:68-69.
    [10] Grandy R E. On grice on language[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1989(10): 514-525.
    [11] Fraser B, Nolen W. The association of deference with linguistic form [J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1981 (27):93-94.
    [12] Pavlidou T. Cooperation and the choice of linguistic means: some evidence from the use of the subjunctive in modern Greek[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1991(15):11-42.
    [13] Airenti G, Bara B G, Colombetti M. Conversation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue [J]. Cognitive Science, 1993(17): 197-256.
    [14] Gu Y. Pragmatics and rhetoric: a collaborative approach to conversation //H Parret. Pretending to Communicate. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994:173-195.
    [15] Attardo S. Locutionary and perlocutionary cooperation: the perlocutionary cooperative principle [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997(27):753-779.
    [16] Thomas J. The Dynamics of Discourse: a Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction . Lancaster: Lancaster University, 1986.
    [17] Thomas J. The cooperative principle of H. P. Grice //The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1994: 759-762.
    [18] Thomas J. Cooperative principle[M]//Mey J. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.
    [19] Greenall A K. Towards a Socio-cognitive Account of Flouting and Flout-based Meaning . Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2002.
    [20] Holdcroft D. Irony as a trope, and irony as discourse [J]. Poetics Today, 1983(4): 493-511.
    [21] Okolo B A. Incongruency in discourse: a violation of the "Cooperative Principle"[J]. Meta, 1996(41).
    [22] Penman R. Discourse in courts: cooperation, coercion, and coherence [J]. Discourse Processes, 1987(10): 201-218.
    [23] Pratt M L. The ideology of speech act theory [J]. Centrum (NS), 1981(1): 5-18.
    [24] Sampson G. The economics of conversation[M]//Smith N V. Mutual Knowledge. New York: Academic Press, 1982: 200-210.
    [25] Green G M. The universality of Gricean interpretation //Hall K. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: BLS, 1990.
    [26] Davis W. Implicature: intention, convention, and principle in the failure of gricean theory [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    [27] Lumsden D. Kinds of conversational cooperation[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2008(40): 1896-1908.
    [28] Sarangi S K, Slembrouch S. Non-cooperation in communication [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1992(17): 117-154.
    [29] Gu Y. Toward a multi-goal neo-grice [J]. International Journal of Pragmatics, 2003(14).
    [30] 姜望琪. 当代语用学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2003:221.
    [31] Grice P. The conception of value[M]. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 1991:12,61-62,86.
    [32] Grice P. Aspects of reason [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001:88.
    [33] Schutz A, Luckmann T. The Structures of the Life-world[M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
    [34] Horn L. Pragmatic theory[M]//Newmeyer F J. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    [35] Thomas J. Meaning in Interaction: an introduction to pragmatics[M]. London: Longman, 1995.
    • Related Articles

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Copyright © Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition
    Tel: 010-82338013E-mail: bhskxb@buaa.edu.cnPostal Code：100083

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return