Citation: | Chen Wei. A Comparative Analysis about the Legitimacy of Mediation and Judgment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 56-60. |
[1] | 徐国栋.民法基本原则解释——成文法局限性之克服[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:123. |
[2] | 胡旭晟.法学:理想与批判[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1999:379. |
[3] | 棚濑孝雄.纠纷的解决与审判制度[M]. 王亚新,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994. |
[4] | 范愉.调解年与调解运动[J]. 河南社会科学,2010(1):10-13. |
[5] | 周安平.诉讼调解与法治理念的悖论[J].河北学刊,2006(6):169. |
[6] | 徐涤宇,肖陆平. 法院"调解运动"之反思——基于两种文明秩序的视角[J].法学杂志,2011(2):92. |
[7] | Robert H Mnookin, Lewis Kornhauser. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce[J].Yale Law Journal,1979(88):950. |
[8] | 马丁 ·P ·戈尔丁.法律哲学[M].齐海滨,译.北京:生活 ·读书 ·新知三联书店,1987:222. |
[9] | 庞德. 通过法律的社会控制——法律的任务[M].沈宗灵,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984:29. |
[10] | 陈自强.民法讲义1: 契约之成立与生效[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:127. |
[11] | 陈聪富.契约自由与定型化契约的管制[J]. 月旦法学杂志,2002(91):76. |
[12] | 黄宗智.民事审判与民间调解:清代的表达与实践[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:72-75. |
[13] | Owen Fiss. Against settlement[J]. Yale Law Journal,1984(93):1076. |
[14] | Michael Coyle. Defending the weak and fighting unfairness: can mediators respond to the challenge? [J].Osgoode Hall Law Journal,1998 (36):647. |
[15] | Robert Adler, Elliot Silverstein. When david meets goliath: dealing with power differentials in negotiations[J]. Harv Negotiation Journal, 2000(77):16-17. |
[16] | Levine M I. Power imbalances in dispute resolution, in a study of barriers to the use of alternative methods of dispute resolution[J].Vermont Law School,1984 (146):151. |
[17] | John Harrison. Environmental mediation: the ethical and constitutional dimension[J]. Journal of Environmental Law,1997(97):96. |
[18] | Jordi Agustí Panareda. Power imbalances in mediation-questioning some common assumptions [J]. Dispute Resolution Journal, 2004(3):26. |
[19] | Lon Fuller. Mediation: its forms and functions[J]. Southern California Law Review,1971 (44):325. |
[20] | Chornenki. Mediating commercial disputes: exchanging "power over" for "power with",in rethinking disputes: the mediation alternative[M]. London: Cavendish Publishing,1997:164. |
[21] | 孙立平.社会转型:发展社会学的新议题[J].社会学研究,2005(1):22. |
[22] | Jack B Weinstein. Some benefits and risks of privatization of justice through ADR[J]. OHIO ST J ON DISP RESOL,1996 (11):295. |
[1] | LANG Ping. Conflicts and Solutions of International Financial Regulation under Globalization[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(3): 48-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0905 |
[3] | MENG Zilong. Time Constraint and Algorithm Optimization of Policy Legitimacy in Intelligent Age[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 34(3): 80-87. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0020 |
[4] | LIU Haoran. Impact of Benefit Satisfaction and Safety Concern of Residents near Sensitive Project on Support: Based on Mediating Effects of Legitimacy Perception[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2019, 32(6): 69-76, 91. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0152 |
[5] | CHEN Jun. Inspection on Legitimacy of Administrative Policy-making Against the Background of Risk Society: An Enterpoint on Transfer Station of Urban Waste Incineration[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(4): 27-35. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2016.0293 |
[6] | YU Dan, WANG Yiyi. Analysis on Legitimacy of Chinese Airlines' Overbooking Practice[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(3): 84-90. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2017.0268 |
[7] | GU Ling-yun, TAN An-kui. Ends and Means: An Analysis of the Dual Legitimacy in Public Administration[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(3): 1-5. |
[8] | LI Ju-qian. Legality, Legitimacy and the Consequences: Legal Issues of ASAT[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(3): 46-51. |
[9] | WANG Yu-huan. Justification and Legitimacy: Lockean Approach VS Kantian Approach[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(1): 34-37. |
[10] | LIU Hui. Influence Mechanisms of Government Performance upon Rank Differentiation of Legitimacy Level ——Comparison Between Central Government and Local Governments[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2007, 20(1): 34-37. |