ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Chen Wei. A Comparative Analysis about the Legitimacy of Mediation and Judgment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 56-60.
Citation: Chen Wei. A Comparative Analysis about the Legitimacy of Mediation and Judgment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 56-60.

A Comparative Analysis about the Legitimacy of Mediation and Judgment

More Information
  • Received Date: October 07, 2011
  • Published Date: November 24, 2012
  • Mediation is considered to be inferior justice compared with justice by legal litigation through traditional idea. But this idea is challenged by the ADR movement in the United States. There are obvious defaults in judicial system. Sometimes mediation can get better results and lead to a win-win situation. It is not a serious problem of power unbalance in mediation with deterrent force from judicial system. China's judicial power is rather weak and mediation can help the weak clients to avoid worse situation in judicial procedure.
  • [1] 徐国栋.民法基本原则解释——成文法局限性之克服[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:123.
    [2] 胡旭晟.法学:理想与批判[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1999:379.
    [3] 棚濑孝雄.纠纷的解决与审判制度[M]. 王亚新,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
    [4] 范愉.调解年与调解运动[J]. 河南社会科学,2010(1):10-13.
    [5] 周安平.诉讼调解与法治理念的悖论[J].河北学刊,2006(6):169.
    [6] 徐涤宇,肖陆平. 法院"调解运动"之反思——基于两种文明秩序的视角[J].法学杂志,2011(2):92.
    [7] Robert H Mnookin, Lewis Kornhauser. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce[J].Yale Law Journal,1979(88):950.
    [8] 马丁 ·P ·戈尔丁.法律哲学[M].齐海滨,译.北京:生活 ·读书 ·新知三联书店,1987:222.
    [9] 庞德. 通过法律的社会控制——法律的任务[M].沈宗灵,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984:29.
    [10] 陈自强.民法讲义1: 契约之成立与生效[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:127.
    [11] 陈聪富.契约自由与定型化契约的管制[J]. 月旦法学杂志,2002(91):76.
    [12] 黄宗智.民事审判与民间调解:清代的表达与实践[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:72-75.
    [13] Owen Fiss. Against settlement[J]. Yale Law Journal,1984(93):1076.
    [14] Michael Coyle. Defending the weak and fighting unfairness: can mediators respond to the challenge? [J].Osgoode Hall Law Journal,1998 (36):647.
    [15] Robert Adler, Elliot Silverstein. When david meets goliath: dealing with power differentials in negotiations[J]. Harv Negotiation Journal, 2000(77):16-17.
    [16] Levine M I. Power imbalances in dispute resolution, in a study of barriers to the use of alternative methods of dispute resolution[J].Vermont Law School,1984 (146):151.
    [17] John Harrison. Environmental mediation: the ethical and constitutional dimension[J]. Journal of Environmental Law,1997(97):96.
    [18] Jordi Agustí Panareda. Power imbalances in mediation-questioning some common assumptions [J]. Dispute Resolution Journal, 2004(3):26.
    [19] Lon Fuller. Mediation: its forms and functions[J]. Southern California Law Review,1971 (44):325.
    [20] Chornenki. Mediating commercial disputes: exchanging "power over" for "power with",in rethinking disputes: the mediation alternative[M]. London: Cavendish Publishing,1997:164.
    [21] 孙立平.社会转型:发展社会学的新议题[J].社会学研究,2005(1):22.
    [22] Jack B Weinstein. Some benefits and risks of privatization of justice through ADR[J]. OHIO ST J ON DISP RESOL,1996 (11):295.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LANG Ping. Conflicts and Solutions of International Financial Regulation under Globalization[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(3): 48-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0905
    [3]MENG Zilong. Time Constraint and Algorithm Optimization of Policy Legitimacy in Intelligent Age[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 34(3): 80-87. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0020
    [4]LIU Haoran. Impact of Benefit Satisfaction and Safety Concern of Residents near Sensitive Project on Support: Based on Mediating Effects of Legitimacy Perception[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2019, 32(6): 69-76, 91. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0152
    [5]CHEN Jun. Inspection on Legitimacy of Administrative Policy-making Against the Background of Risk Society: An Enterpoint on Transfer Station of Urban Waste Incineration[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(4): 27-35. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2016.0293
    [6]YU Dan, WANG Yiyi. Analysis on Legitimacy of Chinese Airlines' Overbooking Practice[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(3): 84-90. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2017.0268
    [7]GU Ling-yun, TAN An-kui. Ends and Means: An Analysis of the Dual Legitimacy in Public Administration[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(3): 1-5.
    [8]LI Ju-qian. Legality, Legitimacy and the Consequences: Legal Issues of ASAT[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(3): 46-51.
    [9]WANG Yu-huan. Justification and Legitimacy: Lockean Approach VS Kantian Approach[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(1): 34-37.
    [10]LIU Hui. Influence Mechanisms of Government Performance upon Rank Differentiation of Legitimacy Level ——Comparison Between Central Government and Local Governments[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2007, 20(1): 34-37.

Catalog

    Article views (704) PDF downloads (321) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return