ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Chen Xialing, Ma Luting. Designing Management System to Promote the Sustainable Development of Local Higher Education Institutions: Inspirations from the Higher Education Management Practice of the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 99-105.
Citation: Chen Xialing, Ma Luting. Designing Management System to Promote the Sustainable Development of Local Higher Education Institutions: Inspirations from the Higher Education Management Practice of the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 99-105.

Designing Management System to Promote the Sustainable Development of Local Higher Education Institutions: Inspirations from the Higher Education Management Practice of the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan

More Information
  • Received Date: March 16, 2011
  • Published Date: November 24, 2012
  • The dissymmetry of management system is one of the most important factors that restrict the development of local higher education institution. The management practices of public higher education in the United States, Canada, Germany, and Japan are discussed from the perspective of management and funding system Some common practices of these countries are summarized, for example, provincial/state government is the most important manager and sponsor of public higher education; federal government conducts a macro-management on public higher education; the local government supports the management of public higher education; and the autonomy of university in operating and administrating has been fully emphasized and respected. Combining with the Chinese higher education reform and reality situation of local higher education institutions, it is suggested that the central government indirectly macro-manages higher education, provincial governments conduct integrated management on higher education, and local governments focuse on providing favorable external conditions for higher education.
  • [1] 王保华. 高等教育地方化研究新视野[M]. 青岛:中国海洋大学出版社,2007:107.
    [2] 马陆亭. 现代大学制度的创新方向[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报,2004(4):57.
    [3] 杨晓波. 美国公立高等教育机制研究[M]. 太原:山西教育出版社,2008:135.
    [4] National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of education statistics: 2009 [EB/OL]. [2010-12-20].
    [5] 杨晓波. 试析美国公立高等教育的政府财政政策[J]. 外国教育研究,2006(11):42.
    [6] 肖新生. 走进加拿大高等教育[M]. 郑州:河南大学出版社,2007.
    [7] 王子悦,李素敏. 从加拿大解决高等教育经费问题的策略看我国地方师范院校的经费短缺问题[J]. 天津市教科院学报,2009(1):76.
    [8] 格兰 ·琼斯. 加拿大高等教育——不同体系与不同视角:扩展版[M]. 林荣日,译. 福州:福建大学出版社,2007:3-5.
    [9] 马陆亭,李晓红,刘伯权. 德国高等教育的制度特点[J]. 教育研究,2002(10):77.
    [10] 马陆亭,徐孝民. 国际教育投入与学生资助[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2007(4):101.
    [11] 吕跃军. 日本高等教育的基本情况及启示[J]. 大理学院学报,2007(1):65.
    [12] 史万兵. 高等教育行政管理体制深化改革研究[M]. 北京:教育科学出版社,2008:35.
    [13] 卢乃桂,徐岚. 法国高等教育管理体制变革中的教师学术职业[J]. 高等教育研究,2008(1):93.
    [14] 陈霞玲. 政府促进高校科技发展的政策研究——中美比较的视野. 天津:天津工业大学,2010.
    [15] 崔永江. 地方普通高校可持续发展的有效途径探析[J]. 佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2009(27):110.
    [16] 利荣,吴小丽. 简论地方政府与地方高校关系[J]. 经营管理者,2010(7):284.
    [17] 中国教育部. 国家中长期教育改革和发展纲要(2010-2020) [EB/OL]. (2010-07-29).
    [18] Eter Eisineer K. The rise of the entrepreneurial state [M]. Madison:University of Wisconsin Press,1989:242.

Catalog

    Article views (950) PDF downloads (307) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return