Dong Yan. A Study of Context in Pragmatics-Return to the Real World and Humanity[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 99-102.
Citation:
Dong Yan. A Study of Context in Pragmatics-Return to the Real World and Humanity[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 99-102.
Dong Yan. A Study of Context in Pragmatics-Return to the Real World and Humanity[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 99-102.
Citation:
Dong Yan. A Study of Context in Pragmatics-Return to the Real World and Humanity[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 99-102.
Context to which the scope of pragmatics is closely related, proves to be the most significant content and the core notion of pragmatic study. The evolution from static context to dynamic context, the exploration of the role of context in pragmatics, and the reinforcement that meaning depends on context in which the subject of language is performing linguistic behavior and the emphasis on the contribution of the subject's cognitive-psychological state in communication, indicate a general pragmatic perspective and an attempt to return to the real world and humanity.
Levinson S. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983: 6—27.
[2]
Stalnaker R. Pragmatics[M]//Harman G, Davidson D. Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972: 380—397.
[3]
Kempson R M. Rresupposition and the delimitation of semantics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975:120—235.
[4]
Leech G. Principles of pragmatics[M ]. London: Longman, 1983:95.
[5]
Yule G. Pragmatics[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2007: 3.
[6]
Verschueren J. Understanding pragmatics [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1998.
[7]
何自然. 语用学概论[M]. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 1988:3.
[8]
周礼全. 中国语用学思想·序[M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社,1996:9.
[9]
钱冠连. 汉语文化语用学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 1997:55.
[10]
索振羽. 语用学教程[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2000:14.
[11]
朱永生. 语境动态研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005:5.
[12]
Bussman, Routledge. Dictionary of language and linguistics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000:248.
[13]
Halliday M A K. The linguistic science and language teaching[M]. London: Longman, 1964:90—95.
[14]
Hymes D H. Two types of linguistic relativity[M]//Bright W. Sociolinguistics. Hague: Mouton, 1966: 114—158.
[15]
何兆熊. 新编语用学概要[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社, 2000:18—19, 60.
[16]
Lyons J. Semantics: Vol 1.[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[17]
Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986:1—326.
[18]
Langacker R W. The contextual basis of cognitive semantics[M]//Nuyts J, Pederson E. Language and conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 229—252.
[19]
Mey J. Pragmatics: an introduction[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993: 9.
[20]
冉永平. 语用过程中的认知语境及其语用制约[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2000(8):28—31.
[21]
王建华, 周明强, 盛爱萍. 现代汉语语境研究[M]. 杭州:浙江大学出版社, 2002:63.
[22]
Gibbs R, Moise J. Pragmatics in understanding what is said [J]. Cognition, 1997, 62(1): 51—74.
DownLoad: