Mao Lihong. The Evolution of American Political and Administrative Relationship: the History and the Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 1-6.
Citation:
Mao Lihong. The Evolution of American Political and Administrative Relationship: the History and the Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 1-6.
Mao Lihong. The Evolution of American Political and Administrative Relationship: the History and the Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 1-6.
Citation:
Mao Lihong. The Evolution of American Political and Administrative Relationship: the History and the Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 1-6.
The political and administrative relationship has been the core issue of public administration research. From the perspective of the relationship between the civil service and the politics, especially party politics, This paper reviews and analyzes the relationship between the politics and the administration in the U.S. federal government ,and points out that maintaining the balance between separation and integration has been the main line of the evolution of American political and administrative relationship. The political party plays a key role in the coordination of political and administrative relationship, and democratic politics provides power and security for a healthy development of the political and administrative relationship, which has important implications for regulating China's political and administrative relationship.
Donald P Moynihan, Patricia W Ingraham. The suspect handmaiden: the evolution of politics and administration in the American State[J]. Public Administration Review, 2010(Special Issue December).
[4]
Frederick C. Mosher: democracy and the public service[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982: 60.
[5]
辻清明.日本官僚制研究 [M].王仲涛,译.北京:商务印书馆,2008.
[6]
Brian J Cook. Democracy and administration:Woodrow Wilson’s ideas and the challenge of public management[M].Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007: 91.
[7]
Woodrow Wilson. The study of administration[J].Political Science Quarterly, 1887, 2(2):197—222.
[8]
蓝志勇.行政官僚与现代社会[M]. 广州:中山大学出版社,2003.
[9]
Douglas Skelley B. The persistence of the politics-administration dichotomy: an additional explanation [J].PAQ, 2008(Winter): 549—570.
[10]
韩春晖. 美国行政国家理论及其启示[J].法商研究,2010(6):135—142.
[11]
乔治·弗雷德里克森.公共行政的精神[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[12]
David A Schultz, Robert Maranto. The politics of civil service reform[M]. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc,1998.
[13]
Patrick Overeem. The value of the dichotomy: politics, administration, and the political neutrality of administrators [J]. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 2005, 27(2):311—329.
DownLoad: