ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Chen Shiqi. A Study on Compensation for Flight Delay: Judicial Practice in the European Union[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 35-39,45.
Citation: Chen Shiqi. A Study on Compensation for Flight Delay: Judicial Practice in the European Union[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 35-39,45.

A Study on Compensation for Flight Delay: Judicial Practice in the European Union

More Information
  • Received Date: March 28, 2013
  • Published Date: July 24, 2013
  • Disputes caused by flight delays had bothered world airlines and legislative institutions for a long time. In 2004, for the first time, European Community passed the NO. 261/2004 Regulation to deal with the issue, specifying that airlines were liable to pay compensation to passengers whose flights are delayed. It proves that the EU tries to set up a legal regime conducive to passengers' rights outside of the framework of the Montreal Convention. Later, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled four vital cases, such as Sturgeon, consolidating and perfecting the compensation system. Recently, carrier-passenger disputes happened frequently in China. Chinese are in urgent need of a proper resolution to get out of the affray-compensation vicious circle. There are four aspects of the EU's judicial practice for the purpose of getting some lessons and enlightenments on Chinese aviation: establish Chinese delay compensation system; specify the carriers- obligation of notification; identify the administration; properly balance the interest of the carriers and the passengers.
  • [1] Nordic Council of Ministers. The rights of air passengers in the event of delays and cancellations [M]. Copenhagen: Ekspressen Tryk & Kopicenter, 2002:38.
    [2] Elmar Maria Giemulla, Ludwig Veber. International and EU aviation law: selected issues [M]. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV, 2011:345.
    [3] Brian F Havel. Beyond open skies: a new regime for international aviation[M]. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV, 2009:479.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 陈承新,朱丽萍. 全过程人民民主与基层社会治理耦合的发生机制探析——来自北京历史文化街区的小院议事厅案例观察. 党政研究. 2025(01): 26-35+124 .
    2. 马瑜潞. 新时代农村基层协商民主机制与优化路径研究——以衢州市上洋村“议约互促”为例. 乡村科技. 2025(06): 35-39 .
    3. 韩玉祥. 分类运行的制度设计:使农村基层协商民主运转起来. 内蒙古社会科学. 2024(01): 84-91 .
    4. 黄敏,施嘉盈,许艳霞. 乡约文化与协商空间:衢州市田蓬村“乡约议事”实践研究. 浙江社会科学. 2023(03): 34-43+157 .
    5. 张贤明. 全过程负责:民主质量的责任之维. 云南社会科学. 2022(04): 2-9 .
    6. 张力伟,李璎珞. “三全合一”:基层全过程人民民主的运作模式及其内在机理——基于Q社区的实践分析. 探索. 2022(06): 62-72 .
    7. 付莉萍,叶力. 目光向下的治理:一种基层治理的“述职—监督”模式阐释——以云南文山州“基层干部向农村群众述职”为例. 文山学院学报. 2022(06): 64-68 .
    8. 杨书君. 我国基层协商民主发展的阻滞因素与消解策略探析. 决策探索(下). 2021(07): 83-84 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Article views (929) PDF downloads (1301) Cited by(16)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return