ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Fan Lin, Liu Zhenqian. A Study of the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Chinese EFL Learners' Thematic Inferential Processing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 93-97.
Citation: Fan Lin, Liu Zhenqian. A Study of the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Chinese EFL Learners' Thematic Inferential Processing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(4): 93-97.

A Study of the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Chinese EFL Learners' Thematic Inferential Processing

More Information
  • Received Date: August 05, 2012
  • Published Date: July 24, 2013
  • This experiment was designed to explore the effects of working memory capacity to Chinese EFL Learners' thematic inferential processing during text comprehension. The experiment adopted reading time method with working memory capacity being between participant variable and the priming conditions within participant variable. The participants of this experiment were non-English major college students, and their online thematic inferential processing during narrative text comprehension was examined. Analyses of the data pointed to the following two major findings of this experiment. Firstly, there is a significant main effect of working memory capacity. That is, high working memory capacity participants were able to draw thematic inferences online, whereas their low working memory counterparts showed relative failure to do so. Secondly, there was a significant main effect of priming conditions, but the interaction between the priming conditions and working memory capacity was not statistically significant.
  • [1] Van Dijk T A, Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension [M]. New York: Academic, 1983: 49—51.
    [2] Whitten S N, Graesser A C. Introduction: the psychology of themes [J]. Poetics, 2001(29): 135—138.
    [3] Estevez A, Calvo M G. Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inferences [J]. Memory, 2000(1).
    [4] Calvo M G. Relative contribution of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span to elaborative inferences in reading [J]. Learning and Individual Differences, 2005 (15): 53—65.
    [5] Juffs A. Working memory, second language acquisition and low-educated second language and literacy learners //Van de Craats I, Kurvers J, Young-Scholten M. Low-Educated Adult Second Language and Literacy Learners: 6. Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series, 2006: 89—104.
    [6] Harrington M.Working memory capacity as a constraint on L2 development //Harris R J. Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elservier Science Publishers, 1992:123—136.
    [7] Harrington M, Sawyer M. L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1992 (14): 25—38.
    [8] Geva E, Ryan E B. Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second language [J]. Language Learning, 1993 (43): 5—42.
    [9] Walter C. Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2004 (3): 315—339.
    [10] Long D L, Oppy B J, Seely M R. Individual differences in readers’ sentence- and text-level representations [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997 (36).
    [11] Daneman M, Carpenter P A. Individual differences in working memory and reading [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980 (19).
    [12] 崔耀,陈永明. 阅读理解中的预期推理[J]. 心理学报,1996 (3).
    [13] 彭建国. 工作记忆广度与语篇阅读中前向推理和后向推理的关系 . 石家庄:河北师范大学,2003.
    [14] 鲁忠义,范宁. 工作记忆广度与汉语句子语境效应的关系[J]. 心理学报,2006 (1): 22—29.
    [15] Seifert C M, McKoon G, Abelson R P, et al. Memory connections between thematically similar episodes [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1986 (12).
    [16] 范琳,刘振前. 英语叙事语篇标题启动条件对中国学生即时主题推理影响的研究[J]. 外语学刊,2008(4):128—131.
    [17] Kyllonen P C, Stephens D L. Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill [J]. Learning and Individual Differences, 1990 (2): 129—160.
    [18] Daneman M, Green I. Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1986 (25): 1—18.
    [19] Just M A, Carpenter P A. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory [J]. Psychological Review, 1992 (99).
    [20] Ericsson K A, Delaney P F. Models of working memeory: mechanisms of active maintenance and control[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 257—297.
    [21] Horiba Y. The role of causal reasoning and language competence in narrative comprehension [J]. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 1993 (15): 49—81.
    [22] van den Broek P. The causal inference maker: towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension //Balota D, Flores d’Arcais G, Rayner K. Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1990: 423—445.
    [23] Daneman M. Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: a model based on eye fixations [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981 (20): 137—160.

Catalog

    Article views (769) PDF downloads (454) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return