ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Zhang Xuejun. Comparative Research of Liability in Equity by Children[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(6): 39-47.
Citation: Zhang Xuejun. Comparative Research of Liability in Equity by Children[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(6): 39-47.

Comparative Research of Liability in Equity by Children

More Information
  • Received Date: August 07, 2013
  • Published Date: November 24, 2013
  • At Present, Civil Code in Austria,Germany,Belgium,Italy Greece,Portugal and China's Taiwan provides for the rule of liability in equity. According to it, children may be liable for their wrongful act. Liability in equity by children takes on the following characteristics: firstly,it has struck a balance between safety of victims and freedom of act of children; secondly, elements for it are more complicated;lastly, its legal effect may be full compensation or partial compensation. Its merits are the following, it can make children's property available for the compensation and it is more just in legal theory. It is not of strict liability. In the six countries and Taiwan region, elements and legal effects are different. When the minors have met standards of same-age-group children or the unimputable but more wealthier children are hurt, the minors or the poor defendant may be also held liable in equity.
  • [1] 王泽鉴. 侵权行为[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2009.
    [2] 克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔. 欧洲比较侵权行为法:上卷[M]. 张新宝, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2001.
    [3] Willem H van Boom. Children as tortfeasors under Dutch law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [4] Miquel Martín—Casals. Children as tortfeasors under Spanish law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [5] Laurence Francoz—Terminal. Children as tortfeasors under French law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [6] 张学军. 《侵权责任法》第32条第2款规定的法律后果辨析[J]. 学习论坛, 2013(3):75—80.
    [7] 马克西米利安·福克斯. 侵权行为法[M]. 齐晓琨, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2006.
    [8] Miquel Martín—Casals. Comparative report[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, PartⅡ: Children as Victims. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2007:430.
    [9] 克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔. 欧洲比较侵权行为法:下卷[M]. 焦美华, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2001:404.
    [10] Gerhard Wagner. Final conclusions: policy issues and tentative answers[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, PartⅡ: Children as Victims. New York:Springer—Verlag Wien, 2007.
    [11] Giovanni Commandé, Luca Nocco. Children as tortfeasors under Italian law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [12] 郑玉波. 民法债编总论[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2004:154—155.
    [13] 林诚二. 民法债编总论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
    [14] 布斯奈利 F D, 巴尔杰利 E, 科芒达 G. 对他人造成的损害的责任:奥地利法[M]//施皮尔 J. 侵权法的统一:对他人造成的损害的责任. 北京:法律出版社, 2009:17.
    [15] 张金海. 公平责任考辨[J]. 中外法学, 2011(4):758—773.
    [16] Gerhard Wagner. Children as tortfeasors under Germany law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals, Miquel. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [17] 迪特尔·梅迪库斯. 德国债法分论[M]. 杜景林, 卢谌, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2007:633.
    [18] Susanna Hirsch. Children as tortfeasors under Austrian law[M]//Miquel LawMartín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York: Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [19] 考茨欧. 奥地利法中的违法性问题[M]//考茨欧. 侵权法的统一:违法性. 张家勇, 译. 北京:法律出版社, 2009.
    [20] Maria Manuel Veloso. Children as tortfeasors under Portuguese law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York:Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [21] 曾龙兴. 详解损害赔偿法[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2004.
    [22] Pieter De Tavenier. Children as tortfeasors under Belgian law[M]//Miquel Martín—Casals. Children in Tort Law, Part I: Children as Tortfeasors. New York:Springer—Verlag Wien, 2006.
    [23] 杨代雄. 适用范围视角下民事责任能力之反思——兼评《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第32条[J]. 法商研究, 2011(6):54—62.

Catalog

    Article views (696) PDF downloads (369) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return