ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
Zhao Na, Fang Weihua. A Research of the Major Administrative Decision-making Group Discussion and Decision System[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(1): 19-24.
Citation: Zhao Na, Fang Weihua. A Research of the Major Administrative Decision-making Group Discussion and Decision System[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(1): 19-24.

A Research of the Major Administrative Decision-making Group Discussion and Decision System

More Information
  • Received Date: April 21, 2013
  • Published Date: January 24, 2014
  • The major administrative decision-making group discussion and decision system means that major administrative problems must be conducted through full discussion and collective decision. Meanwhile, individual or a minority of people's arbitrariness must be firmly opposed. Whether the major administrative decision-making is scientific and democratic, directly affects the effectiveness of government administrative management activities. Because the major administrative decision-making group discussion directly embodies the democratic centralism, major administrative decision-making errors can be avoided. In this paper, we study and analyze the development of the system of the status major administrative decision-making group discussion and decision system operation rules, procedures and lack of the unified collective discussion and decision procedure, administrative departments lack of democratic consciousness, the social public lack of democratic politics consciousness, administrative decision-making supervision lagging behind and a series of limitations, pointing out that only by establishing a unified, efficient collective discussion and decision procedure, improving the administrative departments of the democratic consciousness and the social public awareness of democratic participation as well as strengthening the supervision of administrative decision can we better our major administrative decision-making system of collective discussion and decision of our country.
  • [1] Black Duncan. On the rationale of group decision making[J]. Jounral of Political Economy, 1948, 56: 23—24.
    [2] Black Duncan. The theory of committees and elections[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958: 55—84.
    [3] 詹姆斯·M·布坎南, 戈登·塔洛克.同意的计算——立宪民 主的逻辑基础[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2000:90—103.
    [4] 胡象明.党政分开与国家战略决策的民主化[J].湖北社会科学, 1988(3):26—28.
    [5] 裴泽庆.多维视角下的多数决规则与党内民主决策[J].湖北社会科学, 2006(1):13—17.
    [6] 郑卫国.影响行政集体决策的心理因素及应对之策[J].成都行政学院学报, 2006(1):20—22.
    [7] 叶战备, 汪平玲.建立完善集体决策环节的党内问责制[J].求实, 2010(17):11—13.
    [8] 翟 军亮, 吴春梅.论社会学习框架下公共服务集体决策的优化[J]. 理论与改革, 2012(2):88—91.
    [9] 杨 继君, 陈林杰.领导集体决策博弈模型及其决策失误分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2011(23): 41—44.
    [10] Buchanan James M.Liberty, market and state[M]. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1986: 244.
    [11] Samuelson, Paul A, Nordhaus William D. Economics[M]. 12th Edition. New York:Mcgraw-hill Book Company, 1985:709.
    [12] 张群梅.公共选择理论的集体决策观分析[J]. 湖南经济管理干部学院学报, 2006(11): 129—130.
    [13] 杨叶红, 刘峰. 重大行政决策中协商民主的困境与突围——以《湖南省行政程序规定》的实施为例[J]. 中国井冈山干部学院学报, 2010(1): 97—98.
    [14] 王建军, 唐娟. 论公共政策制定中的公民参与[J]. 四川大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2006(5):57—61.
    [15] 胡象明.完善政府重大经济社会问题决策的基本程序[J]. 政策, 2004(4): 44—45.
    [16] 胡象明. 论一体化民主决策模式[J]. 武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 1995(3): 79—83.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHONG Qianghui, ZHU Chen, ZI Shuyu. Incentive and Constraint Pricing Design of Equipment Research Taking Cost Risk into Account[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 37(1): 117-122. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0246
    [2]Fan Yongtong, Hao Junjie, Dong Zhen. Top-level Design on Nongovernmental Network Anti-corruption[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2015, 28(4): 34-40. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0537
    [3]Chen Xialing, Ma Luting. Designing Management System to Promote the Sustainable Development of Local Higher Education Institutions: Inspirations from the Higher Education Management Practice of the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, (6): 99-105.
    [4]Yin Yilin, Lin Guangli. A Study on the Program Design of the Integrated Transportation Hub Based on QFD[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(3): 81-84,112.
    [5]SUN Zhi-wu, LI Ping. The Characteristics of Risk and Design of Risk Analysis Index System for Aero-engine Projects[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(3): 62-65.
    [6]CAI Jin-song, WANG Jun-xia. The Design of Evaluation Index System and Model for University Culture Construction[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2009, 22(2): 76-80.
    [7]LIU Hong-shan, ZHAO Shu-ming. A Model Design to Ensure the Effectiveness of the Second Round of The Graduate Record Examination[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2007, 20(S0): 52-55.
    [8]HE Xiu-rong, CHANG Li-ping, LI Mei, LI Dong-mei, . Selection System Arrangement for Graduate Students and Selection Quality[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2007, 20(S0): 16-20.
    [9]WANG Zheng, HAO Wei-chang, WANG Tian-min. Eco-design——Design for Sustainable Development of Society[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2006, 19(3): 28-31.
    [10]WANG Chun-jie, LI Xiao-li. Reformand Practice of Speciality Course Design of Mechanical Designing and Automation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2002, 15(4): 60-62.

Catalog

    Article views (933) PDF downloads (555) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return