留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于邻居边界度的自主决策系统性能边界识别方法

路辉 吕静茹 王诗琪 孙泽斌

路辉,吕静茹,王诗琪,等. 基于邻居边界度的自主决策系统性能边界识别方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(1):80-93
引用本文: 路辉,吕静茹,王诗琪,等. 基于邻居边界度的自主决策系统性能边界识别方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(1):80-93
LU H,LYU J R,WANG S Q,et al. Performance boundary identification method for autonomous decision-making systems based on neighbor boundary degree[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(1):80-93 (in Chinese)
Citation: LU H,LYU J R,WANG S Q,et al. Performance boundary identification method for autonomous decision-making systems based on neighbor boundary degree[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(1):80-93 (in Chinese)

基于邻居边界度的自主决策系统性能边界识别方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0767
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(62371030)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:mluhui@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V221+.92;TP274+.5

Performance boundary identification method for autonomous decision-making systems based on neighbor boundary degree

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (62371030)

More Information
  • 摘要:

    性能边界是度量自主决策系统鲁棒性的重要表征,可以反映自主决策系统对抗扰动的能力。针对性能边界数据多空间分布、增量生成等特点,提出一种基于邻居边界度的自主决策系统性能边界识别方法。面对性能边界搜索空间复杂、全空间尺度不统一的难点,设计邻居边界度指标解决绝对尺度度量问题,并提出基于邻居边界度的性能边界识别流程;考虑利用增量数据结合原有识别结果进一步精确刻画性能边界,提出基于邻居边界度的增量性能边界识别方法,实现对增量数据的高效处理;为解决增量过程中的近邻搜索和反向近邻搜索的效率问题,提出改进局部敏感哈希的近似近邻搜索优化方法;分别以标准测试函数、路径规划系统作为典型的自主决策系统,开展理论研究工作的验证和分析。实验结果表明:基于邻居边界度的性能边界识别方法具有很好的方法参数泛化能力,在路径规划系统上,该方法比对比方法识别准确度高出13.68%,运行时间减少91.57%。

     

  • 图 1  基于邻居边界度的性能边界识别方法框图

    Figure 1.  Framework for performance boundary identification method based on neighbor boundary degree

    图 2  路径规划系统性能边界对示例

    Figure 2.  Examples of path planning system performance for boundary pairs

    图 3  路径规划系统性能边界示意图

    Figure 3.  Performance boundary diagram of path planning system

    图 4  基于邻居边界度的性能边界识别方法示意图

    Figure 4.  Diagram of neighbor boundary degree-based performance boundary identification method

    图 5  增量数据的性能边界识别示意图

    Figure 5.  Illustration of identifying performance boundaries for incremental data

    图 6  哈希同桶概率关系

    Figure 6.  Relationship between same bucket probability and Hash probability

    图 7  标准测试函数预实验结果

    Figure 7.  Standard test functions preliminary test results

    图 8  NBD方法最优性能参数

    Figure 8.  Optimal performance parameters of NBD method

    图 9  BTC方法最优性能参数

    Figure 9.  Optimal performance parameters of BTC method

    图 10  FNS方法最优性能参数

    Figure 10.  Optimal performance parameters of FNS method

    图 11  性能边界识别方法最优F-measure与平均最优F-measure对比

    Figure 11.  Comparison between optimal F-measure and average parameter F-measure for performance boundary identification methods

    图 12  标准测试函数中各性能边界识别方法指标对比

    Figure 12.  Comparison of performance boundary identification methods and indicators in standard test functions

    图 13  平均最优参数下路径规划系统中各性能边界识别方法指标对比

    Figure 13.  Comparison of performance boundary identification methods and indicators in path planning systems under average optimal parameters

    图 14  路径规划系统中性能边界识别方法最优F-measure指标对比

    Figure 14.  Comparison of optimal F-measure for performance boundary identification methods in path planning systems

    图 15  标准测试函数中增量性能边界识别方法指标对比

    Figure 15.  Comparison of indicators for identifying incremental performance boundaries in standard test functions

    图 16  路径规划系统中增量性能边界识别方法指标对比

    Figure 16.  Comparison of indicators for incremental performance boundary identification methods in path planning systems

    图 17  标准测试函数中近邻搜索优化方法评价指标对比

    Figure 17.  Comparison of evaluation indicators for nearest neighbor search methods in standard test functions

    图 18  路径规划系统中近邻搜索优化方法评价指标对比

    Figure 18.  Comparison of evaluation indicators for nearest neighbor search methods in path planning systems

    表  1  被测系统信息

    Table  1.   Tested system information

    标准测
    试函数
    函数状态
    空间范围
    函数真实
    边界比例/%
    路径规
    划系统
    系统状态
    空间范围
    系统真实
    边界比例/%
    1 [−4,4] 26.20 1 [0,500] 41.84
    2 [−10,10] 76.96 2 [0,500] 51.68
    3 [−50,50] 22.21 3 [0,500] 48.05
    4 [−500,500] 39.80 4 [0,500] 50.68
    5 [−10,10] 58.71 5 [0,500] 15.35
    6 [−10,10] 40.62 6 [0,500] 20.26
    7 [0,500] 20.54
    8 [0,500] 17.14
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HORN P. Autonomic computing: IBM’s perspective on the state of information technology[EB/OL]. (2001-3-27)[2023-11-15]. http://www.ibm.com/research/autonomic.
    [2] MULLINS G E, STANKIEWICZ P G, HAWTHORNE R C, et al. Adaptive generation of challenging scenarios for testing and evaluation of autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2018, 137: 197-215.
    [3] SZEGEDY C, ZAREMBA W, SUTSKEVER I, et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks[EB/OL]. (2013-12-21)[2023-11-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199v4.
    [4] GOODFELLOW I J, SHLENS J, SZEGEDY C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples[EB/OL]. (2015-7-16)[2023-11-15]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572.
    [5] SONG Y, KIM T, NOWOZIN S, et al. PixelDefend: leveraging generative models to understand and defend against adversarial examples[EB/OL]. (2018-5-23) [2023-11-15]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10766.
    [6] ILYAS A, SANTURKAR S, TSIPRAS D, et al. Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, 32: 132-138.
    [7] HEO B, LEE M, YUN S, et al. Knowledge distillation with adversarial samples supporting decision boundary[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33(1): 3771-3778.
    [8] PAN D Y, YIN Y J, SUN Y J, et al. Sample selection in support vector machines: a fixed neighborhood sphere approach[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2016: 1089-1093.
    [9] ZYKIN S, ZYKIN V. The boundary identification algorithm for a process control[C]//Proceedings of the Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2022: 1-4.
    [10] CAO H Y, LI H Y, SUN W, et al. A boundary identification approach for the feasible space of structural optimization using a virtual sampling technique-based support vector machine[J]. Computers & Structures, 2023, 287: 107118.
    [11] ZHOU G Q, WEI H, WANG X Y, et al. BSMNet: boundary-salience multi-branch network for intima-media identification in carotid ultrasound images[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2023, 162: 107092.
    [12] SOWJANYA A M, SHASHI M. Cluster feature-based incremental clustering approach (CFICA) for numerical data[J]. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2010, 10: 73-79.
    [13] 欧阳秋宝. 基于局部分布的自组织增量聚类算法[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2012.

    OUYANG Q B. Self-organizing incremental clustering algorithm based on local distribution[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2012(in Chinese).
    [14] ZHENG L W, HUO H, GUO Y Y, et al. Supervised adaptive incremental clustering for data stream of chunks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 219: 502-517.
    [15] 张煜莹, 陆艺, 赵静. 基于增量学习的数控机床故障诊断系统[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(11): 1456-1463.

    ZHANG Y Y, LU Y, ZHAO J. Fault diagnosis system of numerical control machine based on incremental learning[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 1456-1463(in Chinese).
    [16] ESTER M, KRIEGEL H P, SANDER J, et al. Incremental clustering for mining in a data warehousing environment[C]//Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1998: 323-333.
    [17] HORE P, HALL L O, GOLDGOF D B. Single pass fuzzy C means[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2007: 1-7.
    [18] 夏雨轩, 曲海成, 关茜文. 一种面向图像相似度计算的改进哈希算法[J]. 智能计算机与应用, 2022, 12(4): 110-113.

    XIA Y X, QU H C, GUAN Q W. An improved hash algorithm for image similarity calculation[J]. Intelligent Computer and Applications, 2022, 12(4): 110-113(in Chinese).
    [19] DATAR M, IMMORLICA N, INDYK P, et al. Locality-sensitive hashing scheme based on p-stable distributions[C]//Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry. New York: ACM, 2004: 253-262.
    [20] GIONIS A, INDYK P, MOTWANI R. Similarity search in high dimensions via hashing[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. Edinburgh: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999: 518-529.
  • 加载中
图(18) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  458
  • HTML全文浏览量:  120
  • PDF下载量:  50
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-11-24
  • 录用日期:  2024-06-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-08
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-01-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答