基于<i>γ</i>随机搜索策略的无人机集群海上任务分配

吴秋实; 郭杰; 康振亮; 张宝超; 王浩凝; 唐胜景

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0882

基于γ随机搜索策略的无人机集群海上任务分配

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0882

吴秋实¹,
郭杰^1, ,,
康振亮^{1, 2},
张宝超¹,
王浩凝¹,
唐胜景¹

1.
北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081
2.
上海机电工程研究所，上海 201109

基金项目: 上海航天科技创新基金(SAST201711)

详细信息

通讯作者:
E-mail：guojie1981@bit.edu.cn

中图分类号: V279；TP301.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 195
- HTML全文浏览量: 117
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-11-03
- 录用日期: 2022-12-23
- 网络出版日期: 2023-01-10
- 整期出版日期: 2024-12-31

Maritime mission assignment of UAV clusters based on γ random search strategy

1.
School of Aerospace Engineering，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China
2.
Shanghai Electro-Mechanical Engineering Institute，Shanghai 201109，China

Funds: Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund (SAST201711)

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail：guojie1981@bit.edu.cn

摘要

摘要:
针对无人机(UAV)集群海上作战态势复杂、作战任务多样、作战单元异构的特点，建立了海上无人机集群多目标任务分配优化模型，并针对该模型提出了一种基于$\gamma $随机搜索策略的改进离散粒子群算法(γ-DPSO)。将作战态势细节与复杂作战需求等引入无人机集群任务分配问题，建立契合作战场景的无人机集群任务分配作战模型；基于粒子编码矩阵，设计均衡搜索策略、$\gamma $随机搜索策略、分阶段自适应参数，提出基于$\gamma $随机搜索策略的改进离散粒子群算法，解决离散粒子群算法易陷入局部最优造成未成熟收敛的问题。仿真结果表明：针对所建立的符合海上作战特点的无人机集群多目标任务分配优化模型，所提算法可有效解决无人机集群多目标任务分配问题，所提改进策略提高了算法的收敛速度与算法精度。
- 无人机 /
- 协同任务分配 /
- 离散粒子群算法 /
- 随机搜索策略 /
- 均衡搜索策略
Abstract:
In view of the characteristics of complex maritime combat situations, diverse combat missions, and heterogeneous combat units of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) clusters, a multi-objective mission assignment optimization model for maritime UAV clusters was established, and an improved discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm based on $\gamma $ random search strategy (γ-DPSO) was proposed for this model. Firstly, the combat situation details and complex combat requirements were introduced into the mission assignment problem of UAV clusters, and a mission assignment combat model of UAV clusters that fitted the combat scenario was established. Secondly, based on the particle coding matrix, the equilibrium search strategy, the $\gamma $ random search strategy, and the phased adaptive parameters were designed, and the improved discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm based on the $\gamma $ random search strategy was proposed to solve the problem that the discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm was easy to fall into local optimum and caused immature convergence. The simulation results show that the proposed improved algorithm can effectively solve the multi-objective mission assignment problem of UAV clusters for the multi-objective mission assignment optimization model of UAV clusters established in this paper that meets the characteristics of maritime combat, and the proposed improved strategy improves the convergence speed and accuracy of the algorithm.
- unmanned aerial vehicle /
- cooperative mission assignment /
- discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm /
- random search strategy /
- equilibrium search strategy

HTML全文

图 1 多无人机协同海上对抗任务分配问题建模

Figure 1. Modeling of cooperative maritime combat mission assignment problem of multiple UAVs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 海上无人机集群交战场景

Figure 2. Combat scenario of maritime UAV clusters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 粒子间的交叉操作

Figure 3. Intersection operation between particles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 粒子间的变异操作

Figure 4. Mutation operation between particles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 仿真初始位置设置

Figure 5. Initial position setting in simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 自适应惯性权重和加速系数变化曲线

Figure 6. Variation curves of adaptive inertia weight and acceleration coefficient

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 总适应度值变化曲线

Figure 7. Variation of total adaptation value

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 各无人机飞行航程代价变化曲线

Figure 8. Variation of flight range cost of each UAV

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 仿真收敛曲线

Figure 9. Simulation convergence curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 随机收敛曲线

Figure 10. Convergence curves of random particles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 算法对比适应度收敛曲线

Figure 11. Algorithm comparison adaptation convergence curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 海上无人机协同任务分配优化模型基本参数

Table 1. Basic parameters of cooperative mission assignment optimization model for maritime UAVs

基本参数	我方无人机	敌方船只
个数	$ {N_{{V}}} $	$ {N_{{T}}} $
攻击半径	${R_{{{{\mathrm{a}},V}}}}$	${R_{{{{\mathrm{a}},T}}}}$
探测半径	${R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},V}}}}$	${R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},T}}}}$
命中概率	${p_{{{{\mathrm{h}},V}}}}$	${p_{{{{\mathrm{h}},T}}}}$
毁伤概率	${p_{{{{\mathrm{d}},V}}}}$	${p_{{{{\mathrm{d}},T}}}}$
耐久极限	$ {e_{{V}}} $	$ {e_{{T}}} $
携带作战载荷数量	${\varepsilon _{{V}}}$	∞

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 我方无人机携带作战载荷数量与探测半径

Table 2. Number of combat payload carried by Chinese UAVs and detection radius

无人机编号	${\varepsilon _{{V}}}$	${R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},V}}}}$	无人机编号	${\varepsilon _{{V}}}$	${R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},V}}}}$
V₁	3	7	V₁₁	2	6
V₂	2	11	V₁₂	1	10
V₃	3	11	V₁₃	2	9
V₄	3	9	V₁₄	1	11
V₅	2	6	V₁₅	2	12
V₆	2	7	V₁₆	1	9
V₇	1	12	V₁₇	1	6
V₈	2	6	V₁₈	1	10
V₉	1	7	V₁₉	1	10
V₁₀	2	11	V₂₀	1	12

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 敌方船只探测半径

Table 3. Detection radius of enemy vessel

目标编号	$ {R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},T}}}} $	目标编号	$ {R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},T}}}} $	目标编号	$ {R_{{{{\mathrm{s}},T}}}} $
T₁	12	T₁₁	12	T₂₁	8
T₂	10	T₁₂	8	T₂₂	8
T₃	7	T₁₃	9	T₂₃	8
T₄	9	T₁₄	10	T₂₄	10
T₅	8	T₁₅	12	T₂₅	8
T₆	9	T₁₆	12	T₂₆	12
T₇	7	T₁₇	6	T₂₇	11
T₈	10	T₁₈	11	T₂₈	12
T₉	7	T₁₉	9	T₂₉	10
T₁₀	11	T₂₀	11	T₃₀	8

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 模型参数设置

Table 4. Model parameters setting

参数	数值	参数	数值
$ {N_{{V}}} $	20	${N_{{T}}}$	30
$ {w_1} $	0.5	$ {w_2} $	0.5
$ {w_3} $	0.25	$q$	20
$\Delta {t_{1,\min }}$	10	$\Delta {t_{1,\max }}$	20
$\Delta {t_{6,\min }}$	10	$\Delta {t_{6,\max }}$	20

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 算法参数设置

Table 5. Algorithm parameters setting

参数	数值	参数	数值
$N$	1000	$ {K_{\rm{G}}} $	200
$ {\omega _0} $	0.9	$ {\omega _{\mathrm{e}}} $	0.4
$ {c_{1,0}} $	0.35	$ {c_{1,{\mathrm{e}}}} $	0.95
$ {c_{2,0}} $	0.35	$ {c_{2,{\mathrm{e}}}} $	0.95

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 分配结果与顺序

Table 6. Assignment results and order

无人机编号	分配结果与顺序	无人机编号	分配结果与顺序
V₁	T_25,c→T_19,c→T_14,c→T_6,c→T_30,a	V₁₁	T_15,a→T_26,a
V₂	T_20,a→T_25,a	V₁₂	T_17,c→T_12,a
V₃	T_30,c→T_15,c→T_4,c→T_24,c→T_22,c→T_27,c→T_1,a→ T_23,a→T_9,c→T_11,a	V₁₃	T_2,c→T_13,a→T_16,c→T_23,c→T_5,c→T_7,c→ T_3,c→T_18,c→T_14,a
V₄	T_1,c→T_29,c→T_27,a→T_28,a→T_10,a	V₁₄	T_13,c→T_4,a
V₅	T_6,a	V₁₅	T_10,c→T_8,c→T_18,a
V₆	T_17,a→T_5,a	V₁₆	T_28,c→T_16,a
V₇	T_22,a→T_20,c	V₁₇	T_24,a
V₈	T_11,c→T_2,a→T_29,a→T_12,c	V₁₈	T_26,c→T_8,a
V₉	T_19,a	V₁₉	T_21,a
V₁₀	T_21,c→T_3,a→T_7,a	V₂₀	T_9,a

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 迭代至200代时添加与未添加随机粒子的收敛精度

Table 7. Convergence accuracy with and without random particles in iteration to 200 generations

是否添加随机粒子	迭代至200代时的适应度值
添加随机粒子	1.667
未添加随机粒子	1.810

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 迭代至200代时不同算法的收敛精度

Table 8. Convergence accuracy of different algorithms in iteration to 200 generations

算法	迭代至200代时的适应度值
$\gamma $-DPSO	1.667
DPSO	4.425
改进DPSO ^[22]	2.090
CPSO^[26]	1.989

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(26)

[1]	谢伟, 陶浩, 龚俊斌, 等. 海上无人系统集群发展现状及关键技术研究进展[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2021, 16(1): 7-17. XIE W, TAO H, GONG J B, et al. Research advances in the development status and key technology of unmanned marine vehicle swarm operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(1): 7-17(in Chinese).
[2]	刘丽, 武坦然, 邵东青. 美军空中无人作战概念解析[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2022, 38(1): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2421.2022.01.006 LIU L, WU T R, SHAO D Q. Analysis of the combat concept of unmanned aerial system of the US armed forces[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2022, 38(1): 26-30(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2421.2022.01.006
[3]	王宇, 郭兴旺. 无人系统集群海上作战应用研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2019, 39(12): 21-25. WANG Y, GUO X W. Research on the application of unmanned system cluster in marine combat applications[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2019, 39(12): 21-25(in Chinese).
[4]	吴子沉, 胡斌. 基于态势认知的无人机集群围捕方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 424-430. WU Z C, HU B. Swarm rounding up method of UAV based on situation cognition[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(2): 424-430(in Chinese).
[5]	李桂亮, 毕海洋, 洪雪健, 等. 基于DE-DPSO-GT-SA算法的协同多任务分配[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(1): 90-96. LI G L, BI H Y, HONG X J, et al. Cooperative multi-task assignment based on DE-DPSO-GT-SA algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(1): 90-96(in Chinese).
[6]	梁天骄, 陈晓明, 杨朝旭, 等. 舰载无人机滑行轨迹控制方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 289-296. LIANG T J, CHEN X M, YANG Z X, et al. Trajectory control method for unmanned carrier aircraft taxiing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(2): 289-296(in Chinese).
[7]	张令, 段海滨, 雍婷, 等. 基于寒鸦配对交互行为的无人机集群编队控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 391-397. ZHANG L, DUAN H B, YONG T, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle swarm formation control based on paired interaction mechanism in jackdaws[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(2): 391-397(in Chinese).
[8]	符小卫, 陈子浩. 多无人机协同探测快速目标的控制方法设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3295-3304. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.30 FU X W, CHEN Z H. Design of control method for multi-UAV cooperative detection of fast target[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3295-3304(in Chinese). doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.30
[9]	郭继峰, 郑红星, 贾涛, 等. 异构无人系统协同作战关键技术综述[J]. 宇航学报, 2020, 41(6): 686-696. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.06.006 GUO J F, ZHENG H X, JIA T, et al. Summary of key technologies for heterogeneous unmanned system cooperative operations[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41(6): 686-696(in Chinese). doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.06.006
[10]	GAO S, WU J Z, AI J L. Multi-UAV reconnaissance task allocation for heterogeneous targets using grouping ant colony optimization algorithm[J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(10): 7155-7167. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-05675-8
[11]	KIM J, OH H, YU B, et al. Optimal task assignment for UAV swarm operations in hostile environments[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2021, 22(2): 456-467. doi: 10.1007/s42405-020-00317-z
[12]	HUO L, ZHU J, WU G, et al. A novel simulated annealing based strategy for balanced UAV task assignment and path planning[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(17): 4769. doi: 10.3390/s20174769
[13]	王然然, 魏文领, 杨铭超, 等. 考虑协同航路规划的多无人机任务分配[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S2): 24-35. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24234 WANG R R, WEI W L, YANG M C, et al. Task allocation of multiple UAVs considering cooperative route planning[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(S2): 24-35(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24234
[14]	XU G T, LIU L, TENG L, et al. Cooperative multiple task assignment considering precedence constraints using multi-chromosome encoded genetic algorithm[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2018: 1859.
[15]	马也, 范文慧, 常天庆. 基于智能算法的无人集群防御作战方案优化方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1415-1425. MA Y, FAN W H, CHANG T Q. Optimization method of unmanned swarm defensive combat scheme based on intelligent algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(6): 1415-1425(in Chinese).
[16]	CHEN Y B, YANG D, YU J Q. Multi-UAV task assignment with parameter and time-sensitive uncertainties using modified two-part wolf pack search algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54(6): 2853-2872. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2831138
[17]	WANG Y, YANG R R, XU Y X, et al. Research on multi-agent task optimization and scheduling based on improved ant colony algorithm[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1043(3): 032007. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1043/3/032007
[18]	SHI J Q, TAN L, LIAN X F, et al. A multi-unmanned aerial vehicle dynamic task assignment method based on bionic algorithms[J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 99(1): 107820.
[19]	ZHU Z X, TANG B W, YUAN J P. Multirobot task allocation based on an improved particle swarm optimization approach[J]. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2017, 14(3): 1-22.
[20]	LI M C, LIU C B, LI K L, et al. Multi-task allocation with an optimized quantum particle swarm method[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2020, 96(1): 106603.
[21]	YAN M, YUAN H M, XU J, et al. Task allocation and route planning of multiple UAVs in a marine environment based on an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2021, 2021: 94. doi: 10.1186/s13634-021-00804-9
[22]	梁国强, 康宇航, 邢志川, 等. 基于离散粒子群优化的无人机协同多任务分配[J]. 计算机仿真, 2018, 35(2): 22-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2018.02.005 LIANG G Q, KANG Y H, XING Z C, et al. UAV cooperative multi-task assignment based on discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Computer Simulation, 2018, 35(2): 22-28(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2018.02.005
[23]	ZHANG J D, CHEN Y Y, TANG Y Q, et al. Cooperative task assignment for UAV based on SA-QCDPSO[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control &Automation. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 864-869.
[24]	何润林. 吸气式高超声速飞行器上升段轨迹优化与制导研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2018: 24-27. HE R L. Research on trajectory optimization and guidance of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle in ascending phase[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2018: 24-27(in Chinese).
[25]	XUE H. A quasi-reflection based SC-PSO for ship path planning with grounding avoidance[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 247(1): 110772.
[26]	仝秋娟, 李萌, 赵岂. 基于分类思想的改进粒子群优化算法[J]. 现代电子技术, 2019, 42(19): 11-14. TONG Q J, LI M, ZHAO Q. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on classification[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2019, 42(19): 11-14(in Chinese).