留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

涡扇发动机等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证

汤鑫豪 窦英睿

汤鑫豪,窦英睿. 涡扇发动机等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2025,51(1):133-140
引用本文: 汤鑫豪,窦英睿. 涡扇发动机等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2025,51(1):133-140
TANG X H,DOU Y R. Design and verification of airworthiness compliance of equivalent endurance test cycle of turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(1):133-140 (in Chinese)
Citation: TANG X H,DOU Y R. Design and verification of airworthiness compliance of equivalent endurance test cycle of turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(1):133-140 (in Chinese)

涡扇发动机等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0953
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:txh0926@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: V231

Design and verification of airworthiness compliance of equivalent endurance test cycle of turbofan engine

More Information
  • 摘要:

    为优化涡扇发动机的持久试车谱,减少试验过程中的三红线构型改装次数,对持久试车谱的等效设计与符合性验证方法进行研究。分析了持久原始试车谱及其不同阶段的损伤特征,以发动机零部件的等效损伤为原则,以减少三红线构型改装次数为目的,提出一种基于等效损伤原则的等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证方法,并以某型发动机高压涡轮叶片为例提出模拟特征试验件设计方案。所提方法可作为整机持久适航取证试验试车谱优化工作的参考,所提方案可支撑模拟特征试验件的等效损伤试验。

     

  • 图 1  典型蠕变曲线[6]

    Figure 1.  Typical creep curve[6]

    图 2  疲劳裂纹发展截面[9]

    Figure 2.  Cross section of fatigue crack development[9]

    图 3  持久试车标准循环[12]

    Figure 3.  Standard endurance test cycle[12]

    图 4  等效持久试车谱设计与验证流程

    Figure 4.  Design and verification of equivalent endurance test cycle

    图 5  基础损伤循环-低循环疲劳

    Figure 5.  Basic damage cycle-low cycle failure

    图 6  基础损伤循环-蠕变

    Figure 6.  Basic damage cycle-creep

    图 7  疲劳-蠕变交互循环

    Figure 7.  Fatigue-creep interaction cycle

    图 8  交互-疲劳-蠕变循环

    Figure 8.  Interaction-fatigue-creep cycle

    图 9  三红线工况叶片温度分布

    Figure 9.  Triple red-line blade temperature distribution

    图 10  应力集中位置等效应力分布

    Figure 10.  Equivalent stress distribution at stress concentration locations

    图 11  缺口平板试验件

    Figure 11.  Notched plate test piece

    图 12  缺口应力分布

    Figure 12.  Notch stress distribution

    图 13  缺口模拟试验件应力梯度归一化对比

    Figure 13.  Uniformization comparison of stress gradients of simulated notched test pieces

    图 14  中心孔平板试验件

    Figure 14.  Center hole plate test piece

    图 15  中心孔应力分布

    Figure 15.  Center hole stress distribution

    图 16  中心孔模拟试验件应力梯度归一化对比

    Figure 16.  Uniformization comparison of stress gradients of simulated center hole test pieces

    表  1  持久试验三红线状态运行时间

    Table  1.   Triple red-line operation time in endurance test

    分段 三红线
    时间/min
    循环数 MTO三红线
    总时间/min
    MCT三红线
    总时间/min
    三红线
    总时间/min
    A 30 25 750 0 750
    B1 30 15 0 450 450
    B2 30 10 300 0 300
    C 90 25 0 2250 2250
    D 0 25 0 0 0
    E 3 25 75 0 75
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 中国民用航空局. 航空发动机适航规定: CCAR-33R2[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011.

    Civil Aviation Administration of China. Aircraft engine airworthiness regulations: CCAR-33R2 [S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011(in Chinese).
    [2] Civil Aeronautics Board. Aircraft engine airworthiness: CAR13[S]. Washington, D. C. : Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952: 4.
    [3] 王晓明, 綦蕾. 民用航空涡轮发动机持久试验条款发展历程[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(2): 431-439.

    WANG X M, QI L. Development history of civil turbine engine endurance test requirements[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(2): 431-439(in Chinese).
    [4] Federal Aviation Administration. Airworthiness standards: Aircraft engines FAR Part 33 amendment 33-32[S]. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2012.
    [5] MOSKOVIC R, LINGHAM I J, CROCKER A G, et al. An experimental and theoretical consideration of the effect of prior creep damage on the heat affected zone fracture toughness of CrMoV steel[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71(4-6): 587-599.
    [6] KAFTELEN H, BALDAN A. Comparative creep damage assessments using the various models[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2004, 39(13): 4199-4210.
    [7] CHATZIIOANNOU K, KARAMANOS S A, HUANG Y E. Coupled numerical simulation of low-cycle fatigue damage in metal components[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 229: 111536.
    [8] JEONG I H, PARK Y M, BAE M K, et al. Low-cycle fatigue characteristics of SNCM 420H steel used to fabricate ships’ engines[J]. Modern Physics Letters B, 2019, 33(14/15): 1940035.
    [9] 许罗鹏, ZHOU M, 王清远. DZ125合金超高周疲劳微观裂纹萌生机制[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2018, 50(6): 245-250.

    XU L P, ZHOU M, WANG Q Y. Micro-crack initiation mechanism of DZ125 Ni-based alloy during very high cycle fatigue[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2018, 50(6): 245-250(in Chinese).
    [10] MATSUZAKI T, SUGIURA R, NAGUMO Y, et al. Crack growth characteristic and damage evaluation under creep-fatigue interactive condition for W-added high-Cr steel[J]. Materials Transactions, 2013, 54(12): 2215-2224.
    [11] XU L Y, ZHAO L, GAO Z F, et al. A novel creep–fatigue interaction damage model with the stress effect to simulate the creep–fatigue crack growth behavior[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2017, 130: 143-153.
    [12] Federal Aviation Administration. Engine over-torque test, calibration test, endurance test, and teardown inspection for turbine engine certification (33.84, 33.85, 33.87, 33.93): AC 33.87-1A [R]. Washington, D. C. : Federal Aviation Administration, 2015.
    [13] 白国娟, 侯乃先, 杨坤, 等. 粉末高温合金涡轮盘初始缺陷概率模型研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2021, 360(2): 252-256.

    BAI G J, HOU N X, YANG K, et al. Study on the initial defect probability model of powdered high temperature alloy turbine disc[J]. Mechanical Design and Manufacture, 2021, 360(2): 252-256(in Chinese).
    [14] 由于, 徐健, 燕群, 等. 涡轮叶片耦合疲劳寿命预测与试验验证[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(5): 946-953.

    YOU Y, XU J, YAN Q, et al. Combined fatigue life prediction and experiment verification for turbine blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(5): 946-953(in Chinese).
    [15] 雷世英, 孙见忠, 刘赫. 涡轮叶片累积损伤指数模型及服役可靠性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 244-260.

    LEI S Y, SUN J Z, LIU H. Cumulative damage index model and service reliability evaluation of turbine blade[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(3): 244-260(in Chinese).
    [16] 何庆富, 迟重然, 臧述升. 几何损伤导致涡轮静叶气动衰减的CNN预测[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2022, 43(12): 3219-3224.

    HE Q F, CHI C R, ZANG S S. CNN prediction of aerodynamic decay of turbine static blades due to geometric damage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(12): 3219-3224(in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1122
  • HTML全文浏览量:  306
  • PDF下载量:  104
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-29
  • 录用日期:  2023-03-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-03-17
  • 整期出版日期:  2025-01-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答