留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法

张修远 常欣 李想 杨放青

张修远, 常欣, 李想, 等 . 基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(11): 2507-2515. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703
引用本文: 张修远, 常欣, 李想, 等 . 基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(11): 2507-2515. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703
ZHANG Xiuyuan, CHANG Xin, LI Xiang, et al. Evaluation method of airflow field plan in warship based on improved ELECTRE method[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(11): 2507-2515. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703(in Chinese)
Citation: ZHANG Xiuyuan, CHANG Xin, LI Xiang, et al. Evaluation method of airflow field plan in warship based on improved ELECTRE method[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(11): 2507-2515. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703(in Chinese)

基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51309061,51379040);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(HEUCFR150113)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张修远,男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:舰船总体。Tel.:0451-82519824,E-mail:lyyg-zxy@163.com;常欣,男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师。主要研究方向:舰船总体与船舶推进。Tel.:0451-82568592,E-mail:changxin@hrbeu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    常欣,Tel.:0451-82568592,E-mail:changxin@hrbeu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U662.3

Evaluation method of airflow field plan in warship based on improved ELECTRE method

  • 摘要: 从气流场对舰载机作业的影响出发,构建了气流场评估指标体系。针对层次分析法一致性检验的缺陷,结合群决策特征根法(GEM)和决策熵理论,提出了结果可靠性可量化的气流场评估的赋权方法。结合模糊集理论知识,将经典ELECTRE法拓展到模糊环境下;排序计算中涉及到的指标评价值以三角模糊数的形式给出;使用改进ELECTRE法进行气流场方案的排序,模糊数计算保证了对大量模糊数据的完整处理。通过对3种不同气流场方案进行评估应用实例结果表明,所提出的舰船总体方案群决策方法具有较好的可行性,为舰船气流场方案评价提供了一种新的方法。

     

  • [1] 贺少华,刘东岳,谭大力,等.载机舰船气流场相关研究综述[J].舰船科学技术,2014,36(2):1-7.HE S H,LIU D Y,TAN D L,et al.A review of researches on ship airwakes[J].Ship Science and Tchonology,2014,36(2):1-7(in Chinese).
    [2] POLSKY S A.A computational study of unsteady ship air-wake:AIAA-2002-1022[R].Reston:AIAA,2002.
    [3] 赵维义,王占勇.舰船空气尾流场对直升机着舰的影响研究[J].海军航空工程学院学报,2007,22(7):435-438.ZHAO W Y,WANG Z Y.Research on the effect of warship air-wake on helicopter landing on shipboard[J].Journal of Naval Aeronautical Engineering Institute,2007,22(7):435-438(in Chinese).
    [4] 郜冶,刘长猛.护卫舰气流场数值计算研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2013,34(5):599-603.GAO Y,LIU C M.Numerical calculation of frigate ship airwake[J].Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2013,34(5) :599-603(in Chinese).
    [5] 黄胜,郭海鹏,侯远杭,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船总体方案群决策方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2014,48(1):92-97.HUANG S,GUO H P,HOU Y H,et al.Group decision-making method of warship based on improved TOPSIS[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2014,48(1):92-97(in Chinese).
    [6] 黄胜,郭海鹏,王超.基于面积和斜率灰色关联度的舰船方案群决策方法[J].船舶工程,2014,36(1):100-103.HUANG S,GUO H P,WANG C.Group decision-making of warship scheme based on area and slope grey degree[J].Ship Engineering,2014,36(1):100-103(in Chinese).
    [7] 侯远杭,黄胜,胡玉龙,等.基于相对熵排序的舰船总体方案评价方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2012,46(8):1218-1222.HOU Y H,HUANG S,HU Y L,et al.Evaluation of warship based on relative entropy method[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2012,46(8):1218-1222(in Chinese).
    [8] POLSKY S A,NAYLOR S.CVN airwake modeling and Integration:Initial steps in the creation and implementation of a virtual burble for F-18 carrier landing simulations:AIAA-2005-6298[R].Reston:AIAA,2005.
    [9] 廖全蜜,黄胜,王宇,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船通道人机效能研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2015,50(3):536-542.LIAO Q M,HUANG S,WANG Y,et al.Research of human performance in warship passageway based on improved TOPSIS method[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2015,50(3):536-542.
    [10] 李学全,李松仁,韩旭里.AHP理论与方法研究:一致性检验与权重计算[J].系统工程学报,1997,12(2):111-117.LI X Q,LI S R,HAN X L.Study of AHP theory and method:Test of consistency and calculation of weight vector[J].Journal of Systems Engineering,1997,12(2):111-117(in Chinese).
    [11] 邱菀华,刘美芳.管理决策及其应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2012:131-137.QIU W H,LIU M F.Managerial decision making and its application[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2012:131-137(in Chinese).
    [12] 马俊,邱菀华,张浩.招投标决策模型及其应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2000,26(4):470-472.MA J,QIU W H,ZHANG H.The bidding decision model and its application[J].Journal of Beijing University of Acronautics and Astronautics,2000,26(4):470-472(in Chinese).
    [13] 张吉军.模糊层次分析法(FAHP)[J].模糊系统与数学,2002,14(2):80-88.ZHANG J J.Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process(FAHP)[J].Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics,2002,14(2):80-88(in Chinese).
    [14] 高璟,张强.基于ELECTRE方法的模糊多属性群决策[J].数学实践与认识,2009,39(9):21-27.GAO J,ZHANG Q.Extensions of the ELECTRE for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2009,39(9):21-27(in Chinese).
    [15] XU Z,CHEN J.An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making[J].Journal of Information Science,2007,177(1):248-263.
    [16] 陆超,姜治芳,王涛.利用缩比模型CFD数值模拟计算舰面空气流场相似准则数的影响探讨[J].中国舰船研究,2008,3(6):45-48.LU C,JIANG Z F,WANG T.Discussion on comparability of scaled models for CFD numerical simulation for ship airwake[J].Chinese Journal of Ship Research,2008,3(6):45-48(in Chinese).
    [17] REDDY K,TOFFOLETTO R,JONES K.Numerical simulation of ship airwake[J].Computer & Fluids,2000,29(4):451-465.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  543
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  395
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-10-29
  • 修回日期:  2015-12-18
  • 刊出日期:  2016-11-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答