Volume 49 Issue 11
Nov.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU C P,XIAO X,ZHAO J Q. Pilots’ mental workload dynamic prediction based on cognitive process[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(11):2921-2928 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0053
Citation: LIU C P,XIAO X,ZHAO J Q. Pilots’ mental workload dynamic prediction based on cognitive process[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(11):2921-2928 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0053

Pilots’ mental workload dynamic prediction based on cognitive process

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0053
Funds:  Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Civil Aviation Administration of China (U1733118); National Natural Science Foundation of China (71301005)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:zjq206@buaa.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 27 Jan 2022
  • Accepted Date: 04 Mar 2022
  • Publish Date: 11 Mar 2022
  • Modern military flight systems are highly information-intensive and their tasks are complex and changeable. In order to explore the influence of information processing types and multi-task coordination on pilots’ mental workload, a quantitative prediction model based on the cognitive process was proposed. The ACT-R cognitive module and the mental workload determinants were used to separate the pilot’s mental workload into perceptual workload and cognitive burden. The multi-task resource interference for mental workload was calculated based on multiple resources. 16 subjects were selected to complete the multi-factor mental workload experiment. The results showed that the main effects of flight performance, NASA-TLX, average saccade time and scanning rate were significant (P<0.05). Subjective evaluation, RRCV and HR were significantly positively correlated with the total mental workload. And the average mental workload was significantly positively correlated with flight performance, pupil diameter and average saccade time. In order to anticipate and assess the mental workload of pilots, the prediction model offered a certain application value.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PRINZEL L J, KRAMER L J, SHELTON K J, et al. Flight deck interval management delegated separation using equivalent visual operations[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2012, 28(2): 119-130. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2012.634764
    [2]
    WANYAN X R, ZHUANG D M, LIN Y Z, et al. Influence of mental workload on detecting information varieties revealed by mismatch negativity during flight simulation[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2018, 64: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2017.08.004
    [3]
    WICKENS C D. Mental workload: assessment, prediction and consequences[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2017: 18-29.
    [4]
    陆旭, 王天博, 庞丽萍, 等. 执飞任务中剩余脑力负荷量化评估模型研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(5): 1184-1192.

    LU X, WANG T B, PANG L P, et al. Quantitative evaluation model of surplus mental workload in flight task[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronsutics, 2023, 49(5): 1184-1192(in Chinese).
    [5]
    SWELLER J. Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2010, 22(2): 123-138. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
    [6]
    CHEN S, EPPS J. Using task-induced pupil diameter and blink rate to infer cognitive load[J]. Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, 29(4): 390-413. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2014.892428
    [7]
    JO S, MYUNG R, YOON D. Quantitative prediction of mental workload with the ACT-R cognitive architecture[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2012, 42(4): 359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.03.004
    [8]
    CAO S, LIU Y. Mental workload modeling in an integrated cognitive architecture[C]//Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. London: SAGE Publications, 2011, 55(1): 2083-2087.
    [9]
    LIANG S F M, RAU C L, TSAI P F, et al. Validation of a task demand measure for predicting mental workloads of physical therapists[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2014, 44(5): 747-752. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.08.002
    [10]
    WICKENS C D. Multiple resources and mental workload[J]. Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008, 50(3): 449-455. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288394
    [11]
    LIU C P, WANYAN X R, XIAO X, et al. Pilots’ mental workload prediction based on timeline analysis[J]. Technology and Health Care, 2020, 28(S1): 207-216.
    [12]
    LAUGHERY K R, PLOTT J B, MATESSA M, et al. Modeling human performance in complex systems[M]//SALVENDY G. HandBook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2012: 931-961.
    [13]
    PARASURAMAN R, ROVIRA E. Workload modeling and workload management: Recent theoretical developments: ARL-CR-0562[R]. Adelphi: U. S. Army Research Laboratory, 2005: 1-19.
    [14]
    XIE B, SALVENDY G. Prediction of mental workload in single and multiple tasks environments[J]. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2000, 4(3): 213-242. doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0403_3
    [15]
    GALY E, CARIOU M, MÉLAN C. What is the relationship between mental workload factors and cognitive load types?[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2012, 83(3): 269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.023
    [16]
    冯传宴, 完颜笑如, 陈浩, 等. 基于多资源负荷理论的情境意识模型与应用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(7): 1438-1446. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0532

    FENG C Y, WANYAN X R, CHEN H, et al. Situation awareness model based on multi-resource load theory and its application[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronsutics, 2018, 44(7): 1438-1446(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0532
    [17]
    XIAO X, WANYAN X R, ZHUANG D M. Mental workload prediction based on attentional resource allocation and information processing[J]. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering, 2015, 26(s1): S871-S879. doi: 10.3233/BME-151379
    [18]
    王洁, 方卫宁, 李广燕. 基于多资源理论的脑力评价方法[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2010, 34(6): 107-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0291.2010.06.024

    WANG J, FANG W N, LI G Y, et al. Mental workload evaluation method based on multi-resource theory model[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010, 34(6): 107-110(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0291.2010.06.024
    [19]
    肖旭, 完颜笑如, 庄达民. 显示界面多维视觉编码综合评价模型[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(6): 1012-1018. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0428

    XIAO X, WANYAN X R, ZHUANG D M. Comprehensive evaluation model of multidimensional visual coding on display interface[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronsutics, 2015, 41(6): 1012-1018(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0428
    [20]
    HANCOCK P A. Task partitioning effects in semi-automated human-machine system performance[J]. Ergonomics, 2013, 56(9): 1387-1399. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.816374
    [21]
    郭司南, 完颜笑如, 刘双, 等. 智能化设计与信息加工通道复杂度对装甲车乘员脑力负荷的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(2): 234-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.02.002

    GUO S N, WANYAN X R, LIU S, et al. Influences of Intelligent design and information processing modality complexity on occupant mental workload[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(2): 234-241(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.02.002
    [22]
    WANYAN X R, ZHUANG D M, ZHANG H. Improving pilot mental workload evaluation with combined measures[J]. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering, 2014, 24(6): 2283-2290. doi: 10.3233/BME-141041
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(221) PDF downloads(30) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return